Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17962300›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2008

DDBJ with new system and face.

H Sugawara, O Ogasawara, K Okubo, T Gojobori, Y Tateno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. High-throughput Sequencing in Vaccine Research.Journal of veterinary research · 2021
    Article
  3. Metadata management and semantics in microarray repositories.Balkan journal of medical genetics : BJMG · 2011
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. GenBank.Nucleic acids research · 2010
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. GenBank.Nucleic acids research · 2009
    Article
  17. The IMGT/HLA database.Nucleic acids research · 2009
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

H SugawaraCenter for Information Biology and DNA Data Bank of Japan, National Institute of Genetics, Research Organization of Information and Systems, Yata, Mishima 411-8540, Japan.
O Ogasawara
K Okubo
T Gojobori
Y Tateno

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DDBJ (http://www.ddbj.nig.ac.jp) collected and released 1 880 115 entries or 1 134 086 245 bases in the period from July 2006 to June 2007. The released data contains the high-throughput cDNAs of cricket and high-quality draft genome of medaka among others. Our computer system has been upgraded since March 2007. Another new aspect is an efficient data retrieval tool that has recently been equipped and served at DDBJ. It is called All-round Retrieval for Sequence and Annotation, which enables the user to search for keywords also in the Feature/Qualifier of the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (http://www.insdc.org/). We will also replace our home page with a more efficient one by the end of 2007.

Indexed as

Databases, Nucleic AcidSequence Analysis, DNAAnimalsComputersInternetSoftware

Identifiers

PMID17962300
PMCPMC2238829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.