ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2007
Similar levels of X-linked and autosomal nucleotide variation in African and non-African populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- A population genomic resource for Drosophila pseudoobscura.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Inferring the Relative Contributions of Evolutionary Processes Shaping X Chromosome Dynamics in the Common Marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) in the Presence of Twinning and Hematopoietic Chimerism.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Recent Insights Into the Evolutionary Genomics of the Critically Endangered Aye-Aye (Daubentonia madagascariensis).American journal of primatology · 2025Review
- Interpreting Patterns of X Chromosomal Relative to Autosomal Diversity in Aye-Ayes (Daubentonia madagascariensis).American journal of primatology · 2025Article
- Enrichment of hard sweeps on the X chromosome compared to autosomes in six Drosophila species.Genetics · 2024Article
- Enrichment of hard sweeps on the X chromosome compared to autosomes in six Drosophila species.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Enrichment of Hard Sweeps on the X Chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Patterns of Population Structure and Introgression Among Recently Differentiated Drosophila melanogaster Populations.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Article
- Genetic Diversity on the Sex Chromosomes.Genome biology and evolution · 2018Review
- A Large Panel of Drosophila simulans Reveals an Abundance of Common Variants.Genome biology and evolution · 2018Article
- Genomics of parallel adaptation at two timescales in Drosophila.PLoS genetics · 2017Article
- Variation in the Intensity of Selection on Codon Bias over Time Causes Contrasting Patterns of Base Composition Evolution in Drosophila.Genome biology and evolution · 2017Article
- The effects of purifying selection on patterns of genetic differentiation between Drosophila melanogaster populations.Heredity · 2015Article
- Faster-X effects in two Drosophila lineages.Genome biology and evolution · 2014Article
- Positive selection drives faster-Z evolution in silkmoths.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2014Article
- The potential role of sexual conflict and sexual selection in shaping the genomic distribution of Mito-nuclear genes.Genome biology and evolution · 2014Article
- Introgression in the Drosophila subobscura--D. Madeirensis sister species: evidence of gene flow in nuclear genes despite mitochondrial differentiation.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2014Article
- The scope and strength of sex-specific selection in genome evolution.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2013Article
- Codon usage bias and effective population sizes on the X chromosome versus the autosomes in Drosophila melanogaster.Molecular biology and evolution · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLevels of molecular diversity in Drosophila have repeatedly been shown to be higher in ancestral, African populations than in derived, non-African populations. This pattern holds for both coding and noncoding regions for a variety of molecular markers including single nucleotide polymorphisms and microsatellites. Comparisons of X-linked and autosomal diversity have yielded results largely dependent on population of origin.
resultsIn an attempt to further elucidate patterns of sequence diversity in Drosophila melanogaster, we studied nucleotide variation at putatively nonfunctional X-linked and autosomal loci in sub-Saharan African and North American strains of D. melanogaster. We combine our experimental results with data from previous studies of molecular polymorphism in this species. We confirm that levels of diversity are consistently higher in African versus North American strains. The relative reduction of diversity for X-linked and autosomal loci in the derived, North American strains depends heavily on the studied loci. While the compiled dataset, comprised primarily of regions within or in close proximity to genes, shows a much more severe reduction of diversity on the X chromosome compared to autosomes in derived strains, the dataset consisting of intergenic loci located far from genes shows very similar reductions of diversities for X-linked and autosomal loci in derived strains. In addition, levels of diversity at X-linked and autosomal loci in the presumably ancestral African population are more similar than expected under an assumption of neutrality and equal numbers of breeding males and females.
conclusionWe show that simple demographic scenarios under assumptions of neutral theory cannot explain all of the observed patterns of molecular diversity. We suggest that the simplest model is a population bottleneck that retains an ancestral female-biased sex ratio, coupled with higher rates of positive selection at X-linked loci in close proximity to genes specifically in derived, non-African populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.