Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17961244›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2007

Similar levels of X-linked and autosomal nucleotide variation in African and non-African populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Nadia D Singh, J Michael Macpherson, Jeffrey D Jensen, Dmitri A Petrov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genetic Diversity on the Sex Chromosomes.Genome biology and evolution · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Faster-X effects in two Drosophila lineages.Genome biology and evolution · 2014
    Article
  16. Positive selection drives faster-Z evolution in silkmoths.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nadia D SinghDepartment of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA. nds25@cornell.edu
J Michael Macpherson
Jeffrey D Jensen
Dmitri A Petrov

Funding

INSTITUTIONAL TRAINING GRANT IN GENOME SCIENCET32HG000044 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL P. SNYDER · 1995 to 2026
$32.2M
Patterns of background nucleotide substitution in the human lineageR01GM077368 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PETROV, DMITRI · 2006 to 2010
$989k
NHGRI NIH HHS 5 T32 HG00044NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000044NIGMS NIH HHS GM077368NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLevels of molecular diversity in Drosophila have repeatedly been shown to be higher in ancestral, African populations than in derived, non-African populations. This pattern holds for both coding and noncoding regions for a variety of molecular markers including single nucleotide polymorphisms and microsatellites. Comparisons of X-linked and autosomal diversity have yielded results largely dependent on population of origin.

resultsIn an attempt to further elucidate patterns of sequence diversity in Drosophila melanogaster, we studied nucleotide variation at putatively nonfunctional X-linked and autosomal loci in sub-Saharan African and North American strains of D. melanogaster. We combine our experimental results with data from previous studies of molecular polymorphism in this species. We confirm that levels of diversity are consistently higher in African versus North American strains. The relative reduction of diversity for X-linked and autosomal loci in the derived, North American strains depends heavily on the studied loci. While the compiled dataset, comprised primarily of regions within or in close proximity to genes, shows a much more severe reduction of diversity on the X chromosome compared to autosomes in derived strains, the dataset consisting of intergenic loci located far from genes shows very similar reductions of diversities for X-linked and autosomal loci in derived strains. In addition, levels of diversity at X-linked and autosomal loci in the presumably ancestral African population are more similar than expected under an assumption of neutrality and equal numbers of breeding males and females.

conclusionWe show that simple demographic scenarios under assumptions of neutral theory cannot explain all of the observed patterns of molecular diversity. We suggest that the simplest model is a population bottleneck that retains an ancestral female-biased sex ratio, coupled with higher rates of positive selection at X-linked loci in close proximity to genes specifically in derived, non-African populations.

Indexed as

Genes, InsectGenes, X-LinkedGenetic VariationAnimalsBase SequenceDrosophila melanogasterFemaleMaleModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence AlignmentSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID17961244
PMCPMC2164965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.