Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1795932›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutisch weekblad. Scientific edition1991

Animal models for testing anti-inflammatory drugs for treatment of bronchial hyperreactivity in asthma.

M J Linssen, O H Wilhelms, H Timmerman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutisch weekblad. Scientific edition, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M J LinssenBoehringer Mannheim GmbH, Allergy Department, FRG.
O H Wilhelms
H Timmerman
Roche (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the first part of this review the important role played by the bronchial hyperreactivity caused by chronic bronchopulmonary inflammation in asthma is described. Deliberately, more emphasis is placed on the role of pro-inflammatory eosinophils, alveolar macrophages, lymphocytes and platelets rather than on mast cells and neutrophils or the numerous mediators. The reason for this is that, on account of the large number of mediators and their multitude of functions and interactions in asthma, antagonism of a specific mediator will probably not be clinically relevant for optimally effective curative treatment of asthma. Inhibition of the infiltration and activation of pro-inflammatory cells is likely to be a more successful approach. In the second part, various animal models of bronchial hyperreactivity, which could be suitable for testing anti-asthmatic drugs, are discussed. Most animal models pay too little attention to chronic bronchopulmonary inflammation as the cause of bronchial hyperreactivity in asthma. In various models the bronchial hyperreactivity is provoked by a single mediator and this leads to selection of specific antagonists which are unlikely to be of clinical benefit. Rats appear to have certain advantages over guinea-pigs as experimental animals for bronchial hyperreactivity.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAsthmaBronchial HyperreactivityDisease Models, AnimalHumansAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal

Identifiers

PMID1795932
OpenAlexW1983606747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.