Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17959004›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2007

Scientific basis for the treatment of low back pain.

R C Mulholland

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Overview on Percutaneous Therapies of Disc Diseases.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2019
    Review
  2. The myth of lumbar instability: the importance of abnormal loading as a cause of low back pain.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

R C MulhollandSpinal Disorders Unit, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK. mulhollandrcm@aol.com
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disc degeneration causes back pain because the function of the disc as a load transferring structure is abnormal, producing abnormal patterns of load which cause pain. Fusion has been unpredictable because it only fortuitously addresses loading. A fusion may be in such a position that it takes load from the disc, and this may be reflected in the way the fusion models, demonstrating a weight bearing pattern, but this is unpredictable. Recognition that we are dealing with a problem of load transfer allows us to design any surgical implant to solve this problem, without stopping movement.

Indexed as

Intervertebral DiscArtificial OrgansHumansLow Back PainProsthesis DesignSpinal DiseasesSpinal FusionStress, Mechanical

Identifiers

PMID17959004
PMCPMC2121280
OpenAlexW1982928938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.