Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17957740›Full record

ReviewClinical cardiology2008

Echocardiographic evaluation and clinical implications of aortic stiffness and coronary flow reserve and their relation.

Attila Nemes, Marcel L Geleijnse, Tamás Forster, Osama I I Soliman, Folkert J Ten Cate, Miklós Csanády

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical cardiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Attila Nemes2nd Department of Medicine and Cardiology Center, Medical Faculty, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical and Pharmaceutical Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary. nemes@in2nd.szote.u-szeged.hu
Marcel L Geleijnse
Tamás Forster
Osama I I Soliman
Folkert J Ten Cate
Miklós Csanády

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The normal human aorta is not a stiff tube but is characterized by elastic properties with a buffering Windkessel function. Aortic stiffening may cause an increase in aortic pulse pressure, left ventricular load, and ultimately left ventricular hypertrophy. This, together with the decreased diastolic transmyocardial pressure gradient interacts with coronary flow and flow reserve. In recent studies, significant correlations between coronary flow reserve and aortic stiffness have been demonstrated in different patient populations. The aim of the present review is to describe the current echocardiographic modalities to measure aortic stiffness and coronary flow reserve and to overview our knowledge about the relationship between aortic stiffness and coronary flow reserve.

Indexed as

Coronary CirculationAortaBlood Flow VelocityEchocardiographyElasticityHumans

Identifiers

PMID17957740
PMCPMC6653349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.