Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17957189›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2007

Models, mechanisms and clinical evidence for cancer dormancy.

Julio A Aguirre-Ghiso

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 850 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
850citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
22.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

850 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1,620 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Malic enzyme 1 senses L-lactate to determine tumor heterogeneity.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

790 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julio A Aguirre-GhisoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Public Health and Center for Excellence in Cancer Genomics, University at Albany, State University of New York, One Discovery Drive, Rensselaer, New York 12144-3456, USA. jaguirre-ghiso@albany.edu
University at Albany, State University of New York · US

Funding

Functional Determinants of Metastatic DormancyR01CA109182 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY · PI AGUIRRE-GHISO, JULIO A. · 2005 to 2025
$8.3M
NCI NIH HHS CA109182NCI NIH HHS R01 CA109182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with cancer can develop recurrent metastatic disease with latency periods that range from years even to decades. This pause can be explained by cancer dormancy, a stage in cancer progression in which residual disease is present but remains asymptomatic. Cancer dormancy is poorly understood, resulting in major shortcomings in our understanding of the full complexity of the disease. Here, I review experimental and clinical evidence that supports the existence of various mechanisms of cancer dormancy including angiogenic dormancy, cellular dormancy (G0-G1 arrest) and immunosurveillance. The advances in this field provide an emerging picture of how cancer dormancy can ensue and how it could be therapeutically targeted.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease ProgressionDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEpigenesis, GeneticHumansMiceMice, Inbred StrainsMice, TransgenicModels, BiologicalNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualNeoplasmsNeovascularization, PathologicNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17957189
PMCPMC2519109
OpenAlexW1993497779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.