Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17956979›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2007

Sulforaphane mobilizes cellular defenses that protect skin against damage by UV radiation.

Paul Talalay, Jed W Fahey, Zachary R Healy, Scott L Wehage, Andrea L Benedict, Christine Min, Albena T Dinkova-Kostova

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03730649 (Effect of Topical Sulforaphane on Skin Aging and With Ultraviolet and Visible Light Exposure), which is not on this map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03730649 early_phase1active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Topical Sulforaphane on Skin Aging and With Ultraviolet and Visible Light Exposure

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2019 to 2026Enrolled12ConditionsSkin AgingArmsSulforaphane (broccoli sprout extract), UV or visible light
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 202 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Exploring Phenolic Compounds in Crop By-Products for Cosmetic Efficacy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Photoprotection for Skin of Color.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paul TalalayDepartment of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. ptalalay@jhmi.edu
Jed W Fahey
Zachary R Healy
Scott L Wehage
Andrea L Benedict
Christine Min
Albena T Dinkova-Kostova
Molecular Oncology (United States) · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
Isolation &Evaluation of Anticarcinogenic GlucosinolateR01CA093780 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TALALAY, PAUL · 2002 to 2011
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS CA06973NCI NIH HHS CA93780NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS R01 CA093780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

UV radiation (UVR) is a complete carcinogen that elicits a constellation of pathological events, including direct DNA damage, generation of reactive oxidants that peroxidize lipids and damage other cellular components, initiation of inflammation, and suppression of the immune response. Recent dramatic increases in the incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancers are largely attributable to higher exposure of an aging population to UVR. Therefore, the development of cellular strategies for intrinsic protection of the skin against the deleterious effects of UVR is imperative. Here we show that erythema resulting from UVR is a comprehensive and noninvasive biomarker for assessing UVR damage and can be precisely and easily quantified in human skin. Topical application of sulforaphane-rich extracts of 3-day-old broccoli sprouts up-regulated phase 2 enzymes in the mouse and human skin, protected against UVR-induced inflammation and edema in mice, and reduced susceptibility to erythema arising from narrow-band 311-nm UVR in humans. In six human subjects (three males and three females, 28-53 years of age), the mean reduction in erythema across six doses of UVR (300-800 mJ/cm(2) in 100 mJ/cm(2) increments) was 37.7% (range 8.37-78.1%; P = 0.025). This protection against a carcinogen in humans is catalytic and long lasting.

Indexed as

Ultraviolet RaysAdultAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, RadiationErythemaFemaleHumansIsothiocyanatesMaleMiceMiddle AgedSkinSulfoxidesThiocyanatesIsothiocyanatessulforaphaneSulfoxidesThiocyanates

Identifiers

PMID17956979
PMCPMC2077285
OpenAlexW2106844299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.