Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17954723›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2008

Lipoteichoic acid is important in innate immune responses to gram-positive bacteria.

Ho Seong Seo, Suzanne M Michalek, Moon H Nahm

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. In Vitro Selection of Antibodies TargetingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Immune Responses to Phage Therapy in Humans: A Review.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Lipoteichoic acid ofFrontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ho Seong SeoDepartment of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 845 19th Street, Birmingham AL 35294, USA.
Suzanne M Michalek
Moon H Nahm
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Development of a Mucosal Vaccine Against F. tularensisU01AI056460 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI MICHALEK, SUZANNE M. · 2003 to 2007
$2.5M
NIAID NIH HHS AI-56460NIAID NIH HHS AI-69695NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI030021NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI056460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To define the role of lipoteichoic acid (LTA) in innate immunity to gram-positive bacteria, we investigated the production of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) by macrophages stimulated with gram-positive bacterial culture supernatants (GPCSs) after their LTA was removed or inactivated. GPCSs were obtained from three gram-positive species (pneumococci, staphylococci, and group B streptococci) during the exponential growth phase (designated early GPCSs) or at the senescent stage (designated late GPCSs). LTA was removed using an anti-LTA antibody or was inactivated by alkaline hydrolysis or platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH) treatment. Both early and late GPCSs from the three gram-positive bacteria stimulated macrophages to produce TNF-alpha primarily via Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), although late pneumococcal supernatant could stimulate macrophages via TLR4 as well. Following LTA inactivation by both methods, early GPCS lost about 85 to 100% of its activity and late GPCS lost about 50 to 90%. Both early and late culture supernatants from Escherichia coli could be inactivated by alkali hydrolysis but not by PAF-AH. In addition, removal of LTA from an early staphylococcal culture supernatant with a monoclonal antibody reduced about 70 to 85% of its potency. Reconstitution of inactivated early GPCS with a highly purified LTA restored its inflammatory activity, but the restored GPCS had higher activity than the pure LTA alone. These findings indicate that LTA is the primary TLR2 ligand in the early phase of gram-positive bacterial infection and remains a major ligand in the late phase when another TLR2 and TLR4 ligand(s) appears. In addition, our findings suggest that another gram-positive bacterial factor(s) synergizes with LTA in inducing inflammatory responses.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineCricetinaeCulture Media, ConditionedGram-Positive BacteriaImmunity, InnateInflammationLipopolysaccharidesMacrophagesMiceTeichoic AcidsTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaCulture Media, ConditionedLipopolysaccharideslipoteichoic acidTeichoic AcidsTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID17954723
PMCPMC2223632
OpenAlexW2097036196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.