ArticleLa Radiologia medica2007
MR imaging and proton spectroscopy of the breast: how to select the images useful to convey the diagnostic message.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of an Automated CAD System for Lesion Detection in DCE-MRI.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Clinical Breast MR Using MRS or DWI: Who Is the Winner?Frontiers in oncology · 2016Review
- Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast lesion evaluation.La Radiologia medica · 2010Article
- Contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging of claustrophobic or oversized patients using an open low-field magnet.La Radiologia medica · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to propose a short way to summarise a breast magnetic resonance (MR) examination including a precontrast and contrast-enhanced dynamic study and proton spectroscopy (1H-MRS) in order to convey the diagnostic message. MATERIALS AND
methodsAt the Department of Radiology of the Policlinico San Donato (University of Milan), breast MR is routinely performed at 1.5 T as follows: 36-slice axial 2D short-time inversion-recovery (STIR) sequence; 128-partition 3D gradient-echo coronal sequence (1-mm3 siotropic voxel) before and after rapid automatic intravenous injection of 0.1 mmol/kg of Gd-DOTA (one precontrast and four postcontrast phases). Postprocessing includes temporal subtraction (postcontrast minus precontrast), maximum intensity projections (MIPs), percent enhancement-to-time curves for small regions of interest, and axial and/or sagittal multiplanar reconstructions. Single-voxel 1H-MRS is acquired to characterise focal lesions. Applying this protocol, more than 1,200 images are generated for each examination. We select only four MIPs of an early subtracted dynamic phase: one axial similar to craniocaudal x-ray mammographic views, one coronal, and two lateral similar to lateral 90 degrees x-ray mammographic views. For each lesion described in the report, we select five items, including three images, one graph, and one table: STIR image, precontrast and subtracted postcontrast images (morphology), percent enhancement-to-time curves and a table of raw data generating the curves (dynamics). If 1H-MRS has been performed, we add other five items: two postprocessed spectra (metabolism) and three images localising the volume of interest. Only the selected items are printed on films and attached to the report.
resultsThe selected items range usually from four (no detected lesion) to 14 (one lesion, studied also with 1H-MRS), to 44 (five lesions, one of them studied also with 1H-MRS). The percentage of items presented with the report if compared with the total number of generated images is equal to 0.33% (4/1,200), 1.17% (14/1,200), and 2.83% (34/1,200), respectively.
conclusionsBreast MR imaging and 1H-MRS can be effectively summarised presenting only a minimal fraction of all generated images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17952685What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.