Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17952642›Full record

ReviewCell biochemistry and biophysics2007

A comparison of the mechanical and structural properties of fibrin fibers with other protein fibers.

M Guthold, W Liu, E A Sparks, L M Jawerth, L Peng, M Falvo, R Superfine, R R Hantgan, S T Lord

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell biochemistry and biophysics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Fibrin as a Versatile Fibrous Biopolymer.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Characterization of Atlantic Forest Tucum (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

M GutholdDepartment of Physics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA. gutholdm@wfu.edu
W Liu
E A Sparks
L M Jawerth
L Peng
M Falvo
R Superfine
R R Hantgan
S T Lord

Funding

INTERACTIVE GRAPHICS FOR MOLECULAR STUDIES &MICROSCOPYP41EB002025 · NIBIB · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SUPERFINE, RICHARD · 2003 to 2019
$16.9M
MUTAGENIC STUDIES OF FIBRINOGEN ALPHA CHAIN FUNCTIONR01HL031048 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LORD, SUSAN T · 1987 to 2010
$3.5M
Novel, single-molecule aptamer selection methodR41CA103120 · NCI · NANOMEDICA, INC. · PI GUTHOLD, MARTIN · 2003 to 2004
$228k
NCI NIH HHS R41 CA103120NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL031048NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL31048NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past few years a great deal of progress has been made in studying the mechanical and structural properties of biological protein fibers. Here, we compare and review the stiffness (Young's modulus, E) and breaking strain (also called rupture strain or extensibility, epsilon(max)) of numerous biological protein fibers in light of the recently reported mechanical properties of fibrin fibers. Emphasis is also placed on the structural features and molecular mechanisms that endow biological protein fibers with their respective mechanical properties. Generally, stiff biological protein fibers have a Young's modulus on the order of a few Gigapascal and are not very extensible (epsilon(max) < 20%). They also display a very regular arrangement of their monomeric units. Soft biological protein fibers have a Young's modulus on the order of a few Megapascal and are very extensible (epsilon(max) > 100%). These soft, extensible fibers employ a variety of molecular mechanisms, such as extending amorphous regions or unfolding protein domains, to accommodate large strains. We conclude our review by proposing a novel model of how fibrin fibers might achieve their extremely large extensibility, despite the regular arrangement of the monomeric fibrin units within a fiber. We propose that fibrin fibers accommodate large strains by two major mechanisms: (1) an alpha-helix to beta-strand conversion of the coiled coils; (2) a partial unfolding of the globular C-terminal domain of the gamma-chain.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsChickensDisulfidesElasticityFibrinFibrinogenMicroscopy, FluorescenceMicroscopy, VideoModels, BiologicalProteinsProtein Structure, SecondaryStress, MechanicalDisulfidesFibrinFibrinogenProteins

Identifiers

PMID17952642
PMCPMC3010386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.