Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17952483›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2008

Etanercept in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: clinical follow-up over one year by ultrasonography.

Annamaria Iagnocco, Chiara Perella, Esperanza Naredo, Gary Meenagh, Fulvia Ceccarelli, Emanuela Tripodo, Stefania Basili, Guido Valesini

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Musculoskeletal ultrasonography in rheumatic diseases.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2023
    Review
  3. Ultrasound in the evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis.European journal of rheumatology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Annamaria IagnoccoRheumatology Unit, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy. aiagnocco@tiscali.it
Chiara Perella
Esperanza Naredo
Gary Meenagh
Fulvia Ceccarelli
Emanuela Tripodo
Stefania Basili
Guido Valesini
Sapienza University of Rome · ITHospital Universitario Severo Ochoa · ESMusgrave Park Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated clinically and sonographically the effects of etanercept therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over 12 months of treatment. Eighteen patients affected by RA who were non-responders or partial responders to disease modifying therapy were commenced on Etanercept treatment. Before starting therapy (T0) and at 12 months (T1), the following parameters were evaluated: erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, number of painful and swollen joints, health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) and disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS 28). Musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) was performed in the following joints: second and fifth metacarpophalangeal, third interphalangeal, wrist and knee joints and a semiquantitative score (0-3) calculated and used to indicate the presence of a localised inflammatory process (synovitis, tenosynovitis, bursitis) and/or structural damage (bone erosion and cartilaginous change). An overall score was calculated based on the sum of the single scores to obtain a comprehensive score indicative of the global pathological change. The US global scores significantly reduced between T0 and T1 (p < 0.0001). The following laboratory and clinical parameters also significantly reduced: ESR (p < 0.0001), CRP (p < 0.02), VAS (p < 0.001), number of total swollen joints (p < 0.001), number of total painful joints (p < 0.01), HAQ scores (p < 0.05) and DAS 28 (p < 0.0001). A positive response to treatment with Etanercept was demonstrated both by US examination of several joints and by clinical evaluation of several parameters. US is a useful tool in the monitoring of biologic therapy in RA, assessing both inflammatory and destructive changes.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBlood SedimentationC-Reactive ProteinDisease ProgressionEtanerceptFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunoglobulin GJointsMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementAntirheumatic AgentsC-Reactive ProteinEtanerceptImmunoglobulin GReceptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor

Identifiers

PMID17952483
OpenAlexW2002249029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.