Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17951709›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2007

In vitro and in vivo analysis of microtubule-destabilizing kinesins.

Jason Stumpff, Jeremy Cooper, Sarah Domnitz, Ayana T Moore, Kathleen E Rankin, Mike Wagenbach, Linda Wordeman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jason StumpffDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jeremy Cooper
Sarah Domnitz
Ayana T Moore
Kathleen E Rankin
Mike Wagenbach
Linda Wordeman
University of Washington · US

Funding

TRAINING IN MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGYT32GM007270 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAIBLE, DAVID W · 1985 to 2020
$21.0M
Microtubule Dynamics and Chromosome SegregationR01GM069429 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WORDEMAN, LINDA · 2004 to 2020
$5.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM07270NIGMS NIH HHS GM69429NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069429NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular microtubules are rigid in comparison to other cytoskeletal elements (1,2). To facilitate cytoplasmic remodeling and timely responses to cell signaling events, microtubules depolymerize and repolymerize rapidly at their ends (3). These dynamic properties are critically important for many cellular functions, such as spindle assembly, the capture and segregation of chromosomes during cell division and cell motility. Microtubule dynamics are spatially and temporally controlled in the cell by accessory proteins. Molecular motor proteins of the kinesin superfamily that act to destabilize microtubules play important roles in this regulation (4).

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantAnimalsBinding SitesBiochemistryCell DivisionCell MovementCHO CellsCricetinaeCricetulusCytoskeletonIn Vitro TechniquesKinesinsMicrotubulesMolecular Motor ProteinsSignal TransductionTubulinKinesinsMolecular Motor ProteinsTubulin

Identifiers

PMID17951709
PMCPMC2908303
OpenAlexW15206357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.