ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2007
Survival of indicator and pathogenic bacteria in bovine feces on pasture.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 176 citations in OpenAlex.
- Abundance of fecal indicator bacteria and diversity of Escherichia coli associated with poultry farms and pasture land cover in streams of northwestern South Carolina.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2024Article
- Prevalence of Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli in the feces of free-roaming wildlife throughout South Korea.PloS one · 2024Article
- Semi-Quantitative Biosecurity Assessment Framework Targeting Prevention of the Introduction and Establishment ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- The bacterial and archaeal communities of flies, manure, lagoons, and troughs at a working dairy.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Metaphylactic antimicrobial effects on occurrences of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. measured longitudinally from feedlot arrival to harvest in high-risk beef cattle.Journal of applied microbiology · 2022Article
- Article
- House fly larval grazing alters dairy cattle manure microbial communities.BMC microbiology · 2021Article
- Sediment and fecal indicator bacteria loading in a mixed land use watershed: Contributions from suspended sediment and bedload transport.Journal of environmental quality · 2021Article
- Modeling the Effect of Tylosin Phosphate on Macrolide-Resistant Enterococci in Feedlots and Reducing Resistance Transmission.Foodborne pathogens and disease · 2021Article
- Article
- Emission Sources of Campylobacter from Agricultural Farms, Impact on Environmental Contamination and Intervention Strategies.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2021Article
- The stable oxygen isotope ratio of resin extractable phosphate derived from fresh cattle faeces.Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM · 2018Article
- Microbiological Impact of the Use of Reclaimed Wastewater in Recreational Parks.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017Article
- Novel Sampling Method for Assessing Human-Pathogen Interactions in the Natural Environment Using Boot Socks and Citizen Scientists, with Application to Campylobacter Seasonality.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2017Article
- Article
- Detection of Campylobacter jejuni in Lizard Faeces from Central Australia Using Quantitative PCR.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Article
- Seasonal persistence of faecal indicator organisms in soil following dairy slurry application to land by surface broadcasting and shallow injection.Journal of environmental management · 2016Article
- Effects of seasonal meteorological variables on E. coli persistence in livestock faeces and implications for environmental and human health.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Persistence of bacterial indicators and zoonotic pathogens in contaminated cattle wastes.BMC microbiology · 2016Article
- Rapid Microbiome Changes in Freshly Deposited Cow Feces under Field Conditions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The survival of enteric bacteria was measured in bovine feces on pasture. In each season, 11 cow pats were prepared from a mixture of fresh dairy cattle feces and sampled for up to 150 days. Four pats were analyzed for Escherichia coli, fecal streptococci, and enterococci, and four inoculated pats were analyzed for Campylobacter jejuni and Salmonella enterica. Two pats were placed on drainage collectors, and another pat was fitted with a temperature probe. In the first 1 to 3 weeks, there were increases (up to 1.5 orders of magnitude) in the counts of enterococci (in four seasons), E. coli (three seasons), fecal streptococci (three seasons), and S. enterica (two seasons), but there was no increase in the counts of C. jejuni. Thereafter, the counts decreased, giving an average ranking of the times necessary for 90% inactivation of C. jejuni (6.2 days from deposition) < fecal streptococci (35 days) < S. enterica (38 days) < E. coli (48 days) < enterococci (56 days). The pat temperature probably influenced bacterial growth, but the pattern of increases and decreases was primarily determined by desiccation; growth occurred when the water content was greater than 80%, but at a water content of 70 to 75% counts decreased. E. coli and enterococcus regrowth appeared to result from pat rehydration. Of 20 monthly leaching losses of E. coli, 16 were <10% of the total counts in the pat, and 12 were <1%. Drainage losses of C. jejuni (generally <1%) were detected for only 1 to 2 months. Although enterococci exhibited the best survival rate, higher final counts suggested that E. coli is the more practical indicator of bovine fecal pollution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.