Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17951213›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical Internet research2007

Information systems for patient follow-up and chronic management of HIV and tuberculosis: a life-saving technology in resource-poor areas.

Hamish S F Fraser, Christian Allen, Christopher Bailey, Gerry Douglas, Sonya Shin, Joaquin Blaya

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical Internet research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Loss to follow-up in anti-HCV-positive patients in a Brazilian regional outpatient clinic.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2016
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Hamish S F Fraser1Division of Social Medicine & Health Inequalities, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. hamish_fraser@hms.harvard.edu
Christian Allen
Christopher Bailey
Gerry Douglas
Sonya Shin
Joaquin Blaya
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard–MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology · USPublic Health Institute of Malawi · MWRwanda Biomedical Center · RWWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

Evaluation of MDR-TB Treatment Strategies in Lima, PeruK23AI054591 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SHIN, SONYA S · 2004 to 2006
$331k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI054591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe scale-up of treatment for HIV and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in developing countries requires a long-term relationship with the patient, accurate and accessible records of each patient's history, and methods to track his/her progress. Recent studies have shown up to 24% loss to follow-up of HIV patients in Africa during treatment and many patients not being started on treatment at all. Some programs for prevention of maternal-child transmission have more than 80% loss to follow-up of babies born to HIV-positive mothers. These patients are at great risk of dying or developing drug resistance if their antiretroviral therapy is interrupted. Similar problems have been found in the scale-up of MDR-TB treatment.

objectivesThe aim of the study was to assess the role of medical information systems in tracking patients with HIV or MDR-TB, ensuring they are promptly started on high quality care, and reducing loss to follow-up.

methodsA literature search was conducted starting from a previous review and using Medline and Google Scholar. Due to the nature of this work and the relative lack of published articles to date, the authors also relied on personal knowledge and experience of systems in use and their own assessments of systems.

resultsFunctionality for tracking patients and detecting those lost to follow-up is described in six HIV and MDR-TB treatment projects in Africa and Latin America. Preliminary data show benefits in tracking patients who have not been prescribed appropriate drugs, those who fail to return for follow-up, and those who do not have medications picked up for them by health care workers. There were also benefits seen in providing access to key laboratory data and in using this data to improve the timeliness and quality of care. Follow-up was typically achieved by a combination of reports from information systems along with teams of community health care workers. New technologies such as low-cost satellite Internet access, personal digital assistants, and cell phones are helping to expand the reach of these systems.

conclusionsEffective information systems in developing countries are a recent innovation but will need to play an increasing role in supporting and monitoring HIV and MDR-TB projects as they scale up from thousands to hundreds of thousands of patients. A particular focus should be placed on tracking patients from initial diagnosis to initiation of effective treatment and then monitoring them for treatment breaks or loss to follow-up. More quantitative evaluations need to be performed on the impact of electronic information systems on tracking patients.

Indexed as

Self CareFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalInformation SystemsTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID17951213
PMCPMC2223184
OpenAlexW2085610886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.