ArticleMetabolism: clinical and experimental2007
Alternative equations for whole-body protein synthesis and for fractional synthetic rates of proteins.
Article in Metabolism: clinical and experimental, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methionine metabolism in human pregnancy.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2010Article
- Re: "alternative equations for whole-body protein synthesis and for fractional synthetic rates of proteins" by Ramakrishnan (Metabolism 2007;56:1550-60).Metabolism: clinical and experimental · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In a constant infusion study of a mass isotope of leucine, two alternative equations are commonly available to calculate amino acid oxidation rate and, thence, whole-body protein synthesis. One, developed by Matthews et al (Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 1980;238:E473-E479), is shown here to require assuming a tracee steady state (TSS), namely, that tracee (unlabeled) amino acid concentrations and fluxes (rates of oxidation and incorporation into protein) are unaltered compared with the preinfusion state. The other, developed by Garlick and coworkers (Melville et al, Metabolism 1989;38:248-255), stems from a protein steady state (PSS) assumption, namely, that protein synthesis is unaffected by the tracer infusion. We derive here a simple expression for the relative difference in whole-body protein synthesis computed from the two assumptions, and a simple test of the validity of TSS in the form of an equality that must be satisfied by plasma measurements at all times. We also propose two experiments to discriminate between the two assumptions. Theoretical reasons and experimental evidence from the literature are offered to support PSS. The two assumptions result in different expressions for fractional synthetic rates (FSRs) of individual or organ proteins-TSS requires the use of tracer-to-tracee ratios and PSS the use of enrichments. An expression is derived here for the relative difference in FSR with TSS vs PSS. For both whole-body synthesis and for FSR, the TSS assumption consistently results in an underestimate, the relative bias roughly equal to the precursor amino acid enrichment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.