ArticleCritical care (London, England)2007
The impact of the introduction of critical care outreach services in England: a multicentre interrupted time-series analysis.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Early warning systems and rapid response systems for the prevention of patient deterioration on acute adult hospital wards.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- A randomized trial of real-time automated clinical deterioration alerts sent to a rapid response team.Journal of hospital medicine · 2014Trial
- Exploring the provision and structure of paediatric critical care outreach teams (PCCOTs) in the UK and Ireland: a national questionnaire study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2025Article
- Implementation of a critical care outreach team in a children's hospital.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Evaluation of NEWS2 response thresholds in a retrospective observational study from a UK acute hospital.BMJ open · 2022Observational
- Article
- Protocol for a mixed-methods exploratory investigation of care following intensive care discharge: the REFLECT study.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Performance of the Afferent Limb of Rapid Response Systems in Managing Deteriorating Patients: A Systematic Review.Critical care research and practice · 2019Review
- Article
- The impact of critical care transition programs on outcomes after intensive care unit (ICU) discharge: can we get there from here?Journal of thoracic disease · 2016Article
- Critical care transition programs and the risk of readmission or death after discharge from ICU.Intensive care medicine · 2016Article
- Evaluation of modernisation of adult critical care services in England: time series and cost effectiveness analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2009Article
- The impact of critical care outreach: is there one?Critical care (London, England) · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCritical care outreach services (CCOS) have been widely introduced in England with little rigorous evaluation. We undertook a multicentre interrupted time-series analysis of the impact of CCOS, as characterised by the case mix, outcome and activity of admissions to adult, general critical care units in England.
methodsData from the Case Mix Programme Database (CMPD) were linked with the results of a survey on the evolution of CCOS in England. Over 350,000 admissions to 172 units between 1996 and 2004 were extracted from the CMPD. The start date of CCOS, activities performed, coverage and staffing were identified from survey data and other sources. Individual patient-level data in the CMPD were collapsed into a monthly time series for each unit (panel data). Population-averaged panel-data models were fitted using a generalised estimating equation approach. Various potential outcomes reflecting possible objectives of the CCOS were investigated in three subgroups of admissions: all admissions to the unit, admissions from the ward, and unit survivors discharged to the ward. The primary comparison was between periods when a formal CCOS was and was not present. Secondary analyses considered specific CCOS activities, coverage and staffing.
resultsIn all, 108 units were included in the analysis, of which 79 had formal CCOS starting between 1996 and 2004. For admissions from the ward, CCOS were associated with significant decreases in the proportion of admissions receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation before admission (odds ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.73 to 0.96), admission out of hours (odds ratio 0.91, 0.84 to 0.97) and mean Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre physiology score (decrease in mean 1.22, 0.31 to 2.12). There was no significant change in unit mortality (odds ratio 0.97, 0.87 to 1.08) and no significant, sustained effects on outcomes for unit survivors discharged alive to the ward.
conclusionThe observational nature of the study limits its ability to infer causality. Although associations were observed with characteristics of patients admitted to critical care units, there was no clear evidence that CCOS have a big impact on the outcomes of these patients, or for characteristics of what should form the optimal CCOS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.