Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17947624›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

Identifying patient smoking status from medical discharge records.

Ozlem Uzuner, Ira Goldstein, Yuan Luo, Isaac Kohane

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 190 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
190citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

190 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evaluating the state of the art in coreference resolution for electronic medical records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Information extraction from clinical notes: are we ready to switch to large language models?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Synth-SBDH: A Synthetic Dataset of Social and Behavioral Determinants of Health for Clinical Text.Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The 2022 n2c2/UW shared task on extracting social determinants of health.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  19. Automated identification of eviction status from electronic health record notes.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

130 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ozlem UzunerUniversity at Albany, SUNY, Draper 114A, 135 Western Avenue, Albany, NY 12222, USA. ouzuner@albany.edu
Ira Goldstein
Yuan Luo
Isaac Kohane

Funding

Informatics for Integrating Biology/ the Bedside (RMI)U54LM008748 · NLM · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KOHANE, ISAAC S. · 2004 to 2013
$39.0M
Integrating Data, Models, and Reasoning in Critical CareR01EB001659 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MARK, ROGER GREENWOOD · 2003 to 2012
$9.8M
NIBIB NIH HHS 1 RO1 EB001659NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001659NLM NIH HHS U54 LM008748NLM NIH HHS U54LM008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The authors organized a Natural Language Processing (NLP) challenge on automatically determining the smoking status of patients from information found in their discharge records. This challenge was issued as a part of the i2b2 (Informatics for Integrating Biology to the Bedside) project, to survey, facilitate, and examine studies in medical language understanding for clinical narratives. This article describes the smoking challenge, details the data and the annotation process, explains the evaluation metrics, discusses the characteristics of the systems developed for the challenge, presents an analysis of the results of received system runs, draws conclusions about the state of the art, and identifies directions for future research. A total of 11 teams participated in the smoking challenge. Each team submitted up to three system runs, providing a total of 23 submissions. The submitted system runs were evaluated with microaveraged and macroaveraged precision, recall, and F-measure. The systems submitted to the smoking challenge represented a variety of machine learning and rule-based algorithms. Despite the differences in their approaches to smoking status identification, many of these systems provided good results. There were 12 system runs with microaveraged F-measures above 0.84. Analysis of the results highlighted the fact that discharge summaries express smoking status using a limited number of textual features (e.g., "smok", "tobac", "cigar", Social History, etc.). Many of the effective smoking status identifiers benefit from these features.

Indexed as

Medical RecordsNatural Language ProcessingPatient DischargeSmokingClassificationHumansMedical Records Systems, Computerized

Identifiers

PMID17947624
PMCPMC2274873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.