Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17947446›Full record

ArticleGenetics2008

Biased distributions and decay of long interspersed nuclear elements in the chicken genome.

György Abrusán, Hans-Jürgen Krambeck, Thomas Junier, Joti Giordano, Peter E Warburton

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Mobile elements contribute to the uniqueness of human genome with 15,000 human-specific insertions and 14 Mbp sequence increase.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Coevolution between transposable elements and recombination.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The role of LINEs and CpG islands in dosage compensation on the chicken Z chromosome.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

György AbrusánDepartment of Ecophysiology, Max Planck Institute of Limnology, Plön, Germany. gyorgy.abrusan@bio.kuleuven.be
Hans-Jürgen Krambeck
Thomas Junier
Joti Giordano
Peter E Warburton
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology · DEUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

A 13q32 BAC Microarray for chromosome function analysisR21HG002919 · NHGRI · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI WARBURTON, PETER E · 2003 to 2004
$339k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG02919NHGRI NIH HHS R21 HG002919
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genomes of birds are much smaller than mammalian genomes, and transposable elements (TEs) make up only 10% of the chicken genome, compared with the 45% of the human genome. To study the mechanisms that constrain the copy numbers of TEs, and as a consequence the genome size of birds, we analyzed the distributions of LINEs (CR1's) and SINEs (MIRs) on the chicken autosomes and Z chromosome. We show that (1) CR1 repeats are longest on the Z chromosome and their length is negatively correlated with the local GC content; (2) the decay of CR1 elements is highly biased, and the 5'-ends of the insertions are lost much faster than their 3'-ends; (3) the GC distribution of CR1 repeats shows a bimodal pattern with repeats enriched in both AT-rich and GC-rich regions of the genome, but the CR1 families show large differences in their GC distribution; and (4) the few MIRs in the chicken are most abundant in regions with intermediate GC content. Our results indicate that the primary mechanism that removes repeats from the chicken genome is ectopic exchange and that the low abundance of repeats in avian genomes is likely to be the consequence of their high recombination rates.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase CompositionBiasBiological EvolutionChickensChromosomesGenomeLong Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsShort Interspersed Nucleotide Elements

Identifiers

PMID17947446
PMCPMC2206104
OpenAlexW2104772279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.