Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17943893›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007

Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke.

J Mehrholz, C Werner, J Kugler, M Pohl

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01700153 (Study of the Effectiveness of an Interactive Robot for the Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb in Children With Cerebral Palsy by Evaluating the 3 Fields of the ICF), which is not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01700153 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

Study of the Effectiveness of an Interactive Robot for the Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb in Children With Cerebral Palsy by Evaluating the 3 Fields of the ICF: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Simple Blind Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorCliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de LouvainRan2012 to 2013Enrolled16ConditionsCerebral PalsyArmsRobotic-assisted therapy, Classical therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  7. Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  8. Water-based exercises for improving activities of daily living after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  9. Guideline
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Neurorehabilitation Clinical Pathways in Stroke: The Padova Model.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J MehrholzKlinik Bavaria Kreischa, Department of Early Rehabilitation, An der Wolfsschlucht 1-2, Kreischa, Germany, 01731. jan.mehrholz@klinik-bavaria.de
C Werner
J Kugler
M Pohl

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectromechanical and robotic-assisted gait training devices are used in rehabilitation and might help to improve walking after stroke.

objectivesTo investigate the effect of automated electromechanical and robotic-assisted gait training devices for improving walking after stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched September 2006), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to September 2006), EMBASE (1980 to September 2006), CINAHL (1982 to October 2006), AMED (1985 to October 2006), SPORTDiscus (1949 to August 2006), the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro, searched September 2006) and the engineering databases COMPENDEX (1972 to October 2006) and INSPEC (1969 to October 2006). We handsearched relevant conference proceedings, searched trials and research registers, checked reference lists and contacted authors in an effort to identify further published, unpublished and ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included studies using random assignment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted the data. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients walking independently (without assistance or help of a person) at follow up. MAIN

resultsEight trials (414 participants) were included in this review. Electromechanical-assisted gait training in combination with physiotherapy increased the odds of becoming independent in walking (odds ratio (OR) 3.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.85 to 5.06; P < 0.001), and increased walking capacity (mean difference (MD) = 34 metres walked in six minutes, 95% CI 8 to 60; P = 0.010), but did not increase walking velocity significantly (MD = 0.08 m/sec, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.17; P = 0.08). However, the results must be interpreted with caution because (1) variations between the trials were found with respect to duration and frequency of treatment and differences in ambulatory status of patients, and (2) some trials tested electromechanical devices in combination with functional electrical stimulation. AUTHORS'

conclusionsPatients who receive electromechanical-assisted gait training in combination with physiotherapy after stroke are more likely to achieve independent walking than patients receiving gait training without these devices. However, further research should address specific questions, for example, which frequency or duration of electromechanical-assisted gait training might be most effective and at what time after stroke, and follow-up studies are needed to find out how long the benefit lasts. Future research should include estimates of the costs (or savings) due to electromechanical gait training.

Indexed as

Orthotic DevicesStroke RehabilitationWalkingEquipment DesignGaitHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRobotics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.