Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17943828›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007

Low-dose aspirin for in vitro fertilisation.

V J Poustie, S Dodd, A J Drakeley

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Challenges of Anticoagulation Therapy in Pregnancy.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2017
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Effects of low-dose aspirin in in-vitro fertilization.Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

V J PoustieRoyal Liverpool Children's Hospital NHS Trust, Institute of Child Health, University of Liverpool, Eaton Road, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK, L12 2AP. v.poustie@liv.ac.uk
S Dodd
A J Drakeley
University of Liverpool · GBAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow-dose aspirin is sometimes used to improve the outcome in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation, despite inconsistent evidence of efficacy and the potential risk of significant side affects. The most appropriate time to commence aspirin therapy and length of treatment required is also still to be determined.

objectivesTo determine the effectiveness of low-dose aspirin for improving the outcome of in vitro fertilisation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment cycles. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (April 2007), MEDLINE (1966 to March 2007) and EMBASE (1980 to March 2007) databases using the following research terms: "(aspirin OR acetylsalicylic acid) AND (in-vitro fertilisation OR intracytoplasmic sperm injection)" combined with the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group's search strategy for identifying randomised controlled trials for reports which appeared to describe randomised controlled trials of low-dose aspirin for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation. SELECTION CRITERIA: Prospective randomised controlled trials, published or unpublished, which addressed the objectives of the review. Quasi-randomised trials were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected studies to include in the review, extracted data and assessed trial quality. MAIN

resultsThe searches identified nine trials which were eligible for inclusion in the review, including a total of 1449 participants. No significant differences were found between the treatment and control groups for any of the outcomes assessed. Only two studies (involving 401 participants) investigated the effect of low-dose aspirin on live birth rate, and no significant difference was found between the treatment and control groups (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.39). No significant difference was found in clinical pregnancy rate between treatment and control groups, based on results from 1240 participants in seven studies (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.43). No data were reported on adverse events related to aspirin treatment in any of the included studies. AUTHORS'

conclusionsUse of low-dose aspirin for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation cannot currently be recommended due to lack of adequate trial data. There is a need for randomised controlled trials investigating the use of low-dose aspirin for different patient groups undergoing in vitro fertilisation. We used control group data from the largest trial included in this review to determine that a sample size of 350 women in each group would be required in order to demonstrate a 10% improvement from the use of aspirin with 80% power at the 5% significance level. Until evidence from appropriately powered trials is available, this treatment can not be recommended.

Indexed as

Fertilization in VitroSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAspirinCyclooxygenase InhibitorsFemaleHumansPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAspirinCyclooxygenase InhibitorsPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID17943828
OpenAlexW1857716933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.