Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17943808›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007

Methadone for cancer pain.

A B Nicholson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02206685 (A Randomized Blinded Prospective Trial Comparing Single Intraoperative Dose of Methadone Versus Placebo in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery.), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02206685 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Blinded Prospective Trial Comparing Single Intraoperative Dose of Methadone Versus Placebo in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery.

TypeinterventionalSponsorBaylor College of MedicineRan2014 to 2020Enrolled74ConditionsThoracolumbar ScoliosisArmsMethadone, Normal Saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Methadone for cancer pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Buprenorphine for treating cancer pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Codeine, alone and with paracetamol (acetaminophen), for cancer pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  5. Methadone for chronic non-cancer pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Pharmacological options for the management of refractory cancer pain-what is the evidence?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2015
    Review
  15. Automated radiochemical synthesis and biodistribution of [¹¹C]l-α-acetylmethadol ([¹¹C]LAAM).Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine · 2014
    Article
  16. Cytochrome P4503A does not mediate the interaction between methadone and ritonavir-lopinavir.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2013
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

A B NicholsonJames Cook University Hospital, Marton Road, Middlesbrough, UK, TS4 3BW. alex.nicholson@stees.nhs.uk
James Cook University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMethadone is an opioid used in the management of cancer pain. A particular role in neuropathic pain has been suggested. The quest for evidence based palliative care prompted a formal appraisal of methadone in comparison with other analgesics. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 1, 2004.

objectivesTo determine effectiveness and safety of methadone analgesia in cancer pain patients. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CancerLit, CINAHL and Cochrane databases were searched in 2002 using a strategy developed with the Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Group. Repeat searches were conducted in September 2006. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of methadone against active or placebo comparator in patients with cancer pain were included. Outcome measures sought were reduction in pain intensity, adverse effects, attrition, patient satisfaction and quality of life. There were no language restrictions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Eligible studies were selected with independent collaboration from a colleague. Full text was retrieved if any uncertainty about eligibility remained. Non-English texts were screened by Cochrane contacts. Quality assessment and data extraction were conducted using standardised data forms. Drug and placebo dose, titration, route and formulation were compared and detail of all outcome measures (if available) recorded. MAIN

resultsThis updated review includes nine RCTs (six double blinded, two crossover) with 459 recruits and 392 completing patients. All studies involved active opioid comparators (morphine, dextromoramide, pethidine, diamorphine with cocaine mixture) with different dose and titration schedules and various pain scoring scales. One study differentiated cases by pain syndrome. Few presented complete pain data sets but complete adverse events data were recorded in every study. Efficacy and tolerability were broadly similar between methadone and morphine. No useful meta-analysis has been possible. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe updated review contains new information supporting the previous conclusions that methadone has similar analgesic efficacy to morphine. The additional study examined neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain, finding no superiority for methadone in the former group. The new study also addresses a clinically relevant concern about short term/single dose studies. Use beyond a few days may result in methadone accumulation leading to delayed onset of adverse effects. In an assessment over 28 days there was a higher rate of withdrawal due to side effects in the methadone group. This observation reinforces the advice that experienced clinicians should take responsibility for initiation and careful dose adjustment and monitoring of methadone.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidHumansMethadoneMorphineNeoplasmsPainPain MeasurementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnalgesics, OpioidMethadoneMorphine

Identifiers

PMID17943808
OpenAlexW4253578307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.