Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17943805›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007

Surgical treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome.

R J P M Scholten, A Mink van der Molen, B M J Uitdehaag, L M Bouter, H C W de Vet

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 82 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 18 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01259271 early_phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2010, after this paper: background citation

Single Center, Single Blind, Randomized, Sham Controlled Pilot Study Using Selective Nerve Stimulation (SNS) Signal for Nerve Modulation With Three Amplitudes (Supra-threshold, Sub-threshold and Sham)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCodman & ShurtleffRan2010 to 2011Enrolled60ConditionsHealthy, PainArmsSelective Nerve Stimulation (SNS) stimulator device
NCT04014244 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Dextrose Injections, Corticosteroids Injections and Surgical Release for Treatment of the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Centre LjubljanaRan2021 to 2023Enrolled100ConditionsPeripheral Nervous System Diseases, Nerve Compression Syndromes, Carpal Tunnel SyndromeArmsCorticosteroid vs. Dextrose, Corticosteroid or Dextrose vs. Surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Local corticosteroid injection versus surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Local corticosteroid injection versus placebo for carpal tunnel syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Low-level laser therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Rehabilitation following carpal tunnel release.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Therapeutic ultrasound for carpal tunnel syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  11. Decompressive surgery for treating nerve damage in leprosy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  12. Splinting for carpal tunnel syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  13. Exercise and mobilisation interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  14. Ergonomic positioning or equipment for treating carpal tunnel syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of the carpal tunnel syndrome: a review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2010
    Pooled it
  17. Carpal tunnel syndrome.BMJ clinical evidence · 2010
    Pooled it
  18. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008
    Pooled it
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R J P M ScholtenAcademic Medical Center, Dutch Cochrane Centre, Room J1B - 108 - 1, P.O. Box 22700, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1100 DE. r.j.scholten@amc.uva.nl
A Mink van der Molen
B M J Uitdehaag
L M Bouter
H C W de Vet

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarpal tunnel syndrome is a common disorder for which several surgical treatment options are available.

objectivesTo compare the efficacy of the various surgical techniques in relieving symptoms and promoting return to work or activities of daily living and to compare the occurrence of side-effects and complications in patients suffering from carpal tunnel syndrome. SEARCH STRATEGY: We updated the searches in 2006. We conducted computer-aided searches of the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Trials Register (searched in June 2006), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2006, Issue 2), MEDLINE (January 1966 to June 2006), EMBASE (January 1980 to June 2006) and also tracked references in bibliographies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing various surgical techniques for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors performed study selection, assessment of methodological quality and data extraction independently of each other. MAIN

resultsThirty-three studies were included in the review of which 10 were newly identified in this update. The methodological quality of the trials ranged from fair to good; however, the use of allocation concealment was mentioned explicitly in only seven trials. Many studies failed to present the results in sufficient detail to enable statistical pooling. Pooling was also impeded by the vast variety of outcome measures that were applied in the various studies. None of the existing alternatives to standard open carpal tunnel release offered significantly better relief from symptoms in the short- or long-term. In three studies with a total of 294 participants, endoscopic carpal tunnel release resulted in earlier return to work or activities of daily living than open carpal tunnel release, with a weighted mean difference of -6 days (95% CI -9 to -3 days). AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is no strong evidence supporting the need for replacement of standard open carpal tunnel release by existing alternative surgical procedures for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. The decision to apply endoscopic carpal tunnel release instead of open carpal tunnel release seems to be guided by the surgeon's and patient's preferences.

Indexed as

Carpal Tunnel SyndromeHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID17943805
PMCPMC6823225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.