Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17943782›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007

Anticholinergic drugs versus other medications for overactive bladder syndrome in adults.

C Roxburgh, J Cook, N Dublin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Oestrogen therapy for urinary incontinence in post-menopausal women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  4. Which anticholinergic drug for overactive bladder symptoms in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Overactive bladder - 18 years - Part II.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Flavoxate in urogynecology: an old drug revisited.International urogynecology journal · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Etiopathogenesis and management of bladder dysfunction in patients with posterior urethral valves.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India · 2010
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

C RoxburghGlasgow Royal Infirmary, 2nd Floor Queen Elizabeth Building, Alexandra Parade, Glasgow, UK, G31 2ER, campbellroxburgh@doctors.org.uk
J Cook
N Dublin
Glasgow Royal Infirmary · GBUniversity Malaya Medical Centre · MYUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOveractive bladder syndrome is defined as "urgency with or without urge incontinence, usually with frequency and nocturia". It is a common condition with significant economic and quality of life implications. While the condition's pathophysiology remains to be fully elucidated, pharmacotherapy is the main treatment option. Despite uncertainty as to drug treatment of choice, anticholinergics are increasingly being used in primary and secondary care settings. This review compares anticholinergic drugs with other types or classes of drugs for treating overactive bladder syndromes.

objectivesTo compare anticholinergic drugs with other types or classes of drugs for treating overactive bladder symptoms. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Trials Register (searched 20 December 2006) and the reference lists of relevant articles. No language or other limits were imposed. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing anticholinergic drugs with other drugs for the treatment of overactive bladder symptoms. At least one arm of the study used an anticholinergic drug and at least one other arm used a non-anticholinergic drug. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers assessed the identified studies for eligibility and methodological quality and independently extracted data from the included studies. Data analysis was performed using RevMan software (version 4.2.8). MAIN

resultsTwelve trials were included in the review. There were seven crossover trials and five parallel group studies. For the comparisons between anticholinergic drugs with tricyclic antidepressants, alpha adrenergic agonists, afferent nerve inhibitors, and calcium channel blocker a single trial was identified for each. Nine trials compared flavoxate with anticholinergics. There was no evidence of a difference in cure rates between anticholinergics and flavoxate. Adverse effects were more frequent in anticholinergic groups versus flavoxate groups (RR 2.28 95% CI 1.45 to 3.56). There was no strong evidence to favour either anticholinergic drugs or the comparators. AUTHORS'

conclusionsMany of the drugs considered in trials in this review are no longer used in clinical practice (and this includes the most commonly tested - flavoxate). There is inadequate evidence as to determine whether any of the available drugs are better or worse than anticholinergic medications. Larger randomised controlled trials in clinical settings are required to further establish the role of these medications in the management of overactive bladder syndrome.

Indexed as

Adrenergic alpha-AntagonistsAdultAntidepressive AgentsCholinergic AntagonistsDopamine Uptake InhibitorsFlavoxateHumansLidocaineNocturiaParasympatholyticsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUrinary Bladder, OveractiveAdrenergic alpha-AntagonistsAntidepressive AgentsCholinergic AntagonistsDopamine Uptake InhibitorsFlavoxateLidocaineParasympatholytics

Identifiers

PMID17943782
PMCPMC7017612
OpenAlexW2137775206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.