SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007
Formula milk versus donor breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02552706 (The Efficacy and Mechanisms of Oral Probiotics in Preventing Necrotizing Enterocolitis Among Very Low Birth Weight Infants With Formula-feeding), which is not on this map. Cited by 96 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Efficacy and Mechanisms of Oral Probiotics in Preventing Necrotizing Enterocolitis Among Very Low Birth Weight Infants With Formula-feeding
Who cites it
96 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 260 citations in OpenAlex.
- Donor human milk for preventing necrotising enterocolitis in very preterm or very low-birthweight infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Formula versus donor breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Banked preterm versus banked term human milk to promote growth and development in very low birth weight infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Formula versus donor breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Early trophic feeding versus enteral fasting for very preterm or very low birth weight infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Trial
- DoMINO: Donor milk for improved neurodevelopmental outcomes.BMC pediatrics · 2014Trial
- Preterm infants fed fortified human milk receive less protein than they need.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2009Trial
- Protein and energy digestibility in preterm infants fed fortified human milk.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2025Article
- Response to "Repeating the errors of the past: the hazards of a commercial human milk industry" Modi (2024) from the Global Alliance of Milk Banks and Associations.Pediatric research · 2024Article
- A comparative review of human milk banking and national tissue banking programs.Maternal & child nutrition · 2024Review
- Human Milk Supports Robust Intestinal Organoid Growth, Differentiation, and Homeostatic Cytokine Production.Gastro hep advances · 2024Article
- Article
- The utilization of systematic review evidence in formulating India's National Health Programme guidelines between 2007 and 2021.Health policy and planning · 2023Article
- How to Provide Breast Milk for the Preterm Infant and Avoid Symptomatic Cytomegalovirus Infection with Possible Long-Term Sequelae.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Impact of mother-baby friendly initiative plus approach on improving human milk feeding for neonates in hospital: a quality improvement before-and-after uncontrolled study.European journal of pediatrics · 2022Article
- Clinical implications of preterm infant gut microbiome development.Nature microbiology · 2022Article
- Observational
- Influence of Human Milk on Very Preterms' Gut Microbiota and Alkaline Phosphatase Activity.Nutrients · 2021Observational
- The risk of infectious pathogens in breast-feeding, donated human milk and breast milk substitutes.Public health nutrition · 2021Review
36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhen sufficient maternal breast milk is not available, the alternative sources of enteral nutrition for preterm or low birth weight infants are donor breast milk or artificial formula milk. Feeding preterm or low birth weight infants with formula milk might increase nutrient input and growth rates. However, since feeding with formula milk may be associated with a higher incidence of feeding intolerance and necrotising enterocolitis, this may adversely affect growth and development.
objectivesTo determine the effect of formula milk compared with donor human breast milk on growth and development in preterm or low birth weight infants. SEARCH STRATEGY: The standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group was used. This included electronic searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2007), MEDLINE (1966 - May 2007), EMBASE (1980 - May 2007), CINAHL (1982 - May 2007), conference proceedings, and previous reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing feeding with formula milk versus donor breast milk in preterm or low birth weight infants. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted using the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group, with separate evaluation of trial quality and data extraction by two reviewer authors, and synthesis of data using relative risk, risk difference and weighted mean difference. MAIN
resultsEight trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Only one trial used nutrient-fortified donor breast milk. Enteral feeding with formula milk compared with donor breast milk resulted in higher rates of growth in the short term. There was no evidence of an effect on long-term growth rates or neurodevelopmental outcomes. Meta-analysis of data from five trials demonstrated a statistically significantly higher incidence of necrotising enterocolitis in the formula fed group: typical relative risk 2.5 (95% confidence interval 1.2, 5.1); typical risk difference: 0.03 (95% confidence interval 0.01, 0.06; number needed to harm: 33 (95% confidence interval 17, 100). AUTHORS'
conclusionsIn preterm and low birth weight infants, feeding with formula milk compared with donor breast milk results in a higher rate of short-term growth but also a higher risk of developing necrotising enterocolitis. There are only limited data on the comparison of feeding with formula milk versus nutrient-fortified donor breast milk. This limits the applicability of the findings as nutrient fortification of breast milk is now a common practice in neonatal care. Future trials may compare growth, development and adverse outcomes in infants who receive formula milk versus nutrient-fortified donor breast milk given as a supplement to maternal expressed breast milk or as a sole diet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.