SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007
Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- In vitro fertilization for women infected by hepatitis C virus: a matched case-control study and a systematic literature review.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2017Pooled it
- The impact of patient preselection on reported IVF outcomes.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2016Pooled it
- Culture media for human pre-implantation embryos in assisted reproductive technology cycles.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs): evaluation of evidence to support public policy development.Reproductive health · 2014Pooled it
- Blastocyst transfer ameliorates live birth rate compared with cleavage-stage embryos transfer in fresh in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: reviews and meta-analysis.Yonsei medical journal · 2014Pooled it
- Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2010Pooled it
- Comparing sequential vs day 3 vs day 5 embryo transfers in cases with recurrent implantation failure: randomized controlled trial.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2021Trial
- Embryo development until blastocyst stage with and without renewal of single medium on day 3.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2018Trial
- Vitrification with shortened equilibration across human embryonic developmental stages: a proof-of-concept study.Human reproduction open · 2026Article
- Article
- Does The Culture of Post-Thawed Cleavage-Stage Embryos to Blastocysts Improve Infertility Treatment Outcomes of Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles? A Randomised Clinical Trial.International journal of fertility & sterility · 2024Article
- Article
- Cumulative live birth rate after oocyte in vitro maturation with a pre-maturation step in women with polycystic ovary syndrome or high antral follicle count.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Article
- Assisted Reproductive Technology without Embryo Discarding or Freezing in Women ≥40 Years: A 5-Year Retrospective Study at a Single Center in Italy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Is Blastocyst Culture Responsible for Higher Pregnancy Rates? A Critical Analysis of the Day of Optimal Embryo Transfer and Embryo Quality.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2022Article
- Association between transferred embryos and multiple pregnancy/live birth rate in frozen embryo transfer cycles: A retrospective study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Article
- When using donor oocytes, does embryo stage matter? An analysis of blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfers using a cryopreserved donor oocyte bank.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Article
- Non-invasive Metabolomic Profiling of Embryo Culture Medium Using Raman Spectroscopy With Deep Learning Model Predicts the Blastocyst Development Potential of Embryos.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent advances in cell culture media have led to a shift in IVF practice from early cleavage embryo transfer to blastocyst stage transfer. The rationale for blastocyst culture is to improve both uterine and embryonic synchronicity and self selection of viable embryos thus resulting in higher implantation rates.
objectivesTo determine if blastocyst stage embryo transfers (ETs) affect live birth rate and associated outcomes compared with cleavage stage ETs and to investigate what factors may influence this. SEARCH STRATEGY: Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register of controlled trials, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE and Bio extracts. The last search date was January 2007. SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials were included if they were randomised and compared the effectiveness of early cleavage versus blastocyst stage transfers. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Of the 50 trials that were identified, 18 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. The primary outcome was rate of live birth. Secondary outcomes were rates per couple of clinical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, high order pregnancy, miscarriage, failure to transfer embryos and cryopreservation. Quality assessment, data extraction and meta-analysis were performed following Cochrane guidelines. MAIN
resultsEvidence of a significant difference in live-birth rate per couple between the two treatment groups was detected in favour of blastocyst culture (9 RCTs; OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.74 (Day 2/3: 29.4% versus Day 5/6: 36.0%)). This was particularly for trials with good prognosis patients, equal number of embryos transferred (including single embryo transfer) and those in which the randomisation took place on Day 3. Rates of embryo freezing per couple was significantly higher in Day 2 to 3 transfers (9 RCTs; OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.56). Failure to transfer any embryos per couple was significantly higher in the Day 5 to 6 group (16 RCTs; OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.97 to 4.11 (Day 2/3: 2.8% versus Day 5/6: 8.9%)) but was not significantly different for good prognosis patients (9 RCTs; OR 1.50, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.84). AUTHORS'
conclusionsThis review provides evidence that there is a significant difference in pregnancy and live birth rates in favour of blastocyst transfer with good prognosis patients with high numbers of eight-cell embryos on Day three being the most favoured in subgroup for whom there is no difference in cycle cancellation. There is emerging evidence to suggest that in selected patients, blastocyst culture maybe applicable for single embryo transfer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17943767What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.