Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17943257›Full record

SynthesisRheumatology international2008

Meta-analysis of the combination of TNF inhibitors plus MTX compared to MTX monotherapy, and the adjusted indirect comparison of TNF inhibitors in patients suffering from active rheumatoid arthritis.

Young Ho Lee, Jin Hyun Woo, Young Hee Rho, Seong Jae Choi, Jong Dae Ji, Gwan Gyu Song

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Rheumatology international, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Adverse effects of biologics: a network meta-analysis and Cochrane overview.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  9. Biologics for rheumatoid arthritis: an overview of Cochrane reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of biologics for rheumatoid arthritis: a Cochrane overview.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2009
    Article
  18. Long-term use of adalimumab in the treatment of rheumatic diseases.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Young Ho LeeDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Medical Center, 126-1 Ka, Anam-Dong, Seongbuk-Ku, Seoul 136-705, South Korea. lyhcgh@korea.ac.kr
Jin Hyun Woo
Young Hee Rho
Seong Jae Choi
Jong Dae Ji
Gwan Gyu Song
Korea University Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This present study was designed to examine (1) whether a combination therapy of TNF (tumor necrosis factor) blockers and methotrexate (MTX) is better than MTX monotherapy, and (2) if the TNF inhibitors such as etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab are all same for treating patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We performed meta-analysis of a combination therapy of TNF-blockers and MTX compared to MTX monotherapy and we performed adjusted indirect comparison of the TNF-blocking agents for their efficacy and toxicity. Three studies met the inclusion criteria for the analysis. Meta-analysis showed that the combination of MTX with anti-TNF inhibitors was more effective than MTX monotherapy and this indicated that combination therapy of anti-TNF inhibitors and MTX was comparable with MTX monotherapy in terms of withdrawal due to the side effects (RR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.52-2.09, P = 0.86). The adjusted indirect comparison did not show any differences between infliximab and adalimumab. However, there was a significant difference for clinical efficacy and side effects between etanercept, adalimumab and infliximab. The RRs for achieving ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 responses and withdrawal due to the side effect in the etanercept group were lower when compared with the adalimumab group. The RR for achieving an ACR20 response in the etanercept group was lower when compared with the infliximab group. The adjusted indirect comparison analysis suggests that the TNF-blocking agents all are not the same with respect to effectiveness and toxicity for the treatment of active RA.

Indexed as

AdalimumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedArthritis, RheumatoidDrug Therapy, CombinationEtanerceptHumansImmunoglobulin GInfliximabMethotrexateReceptors, Tumor Necrosis FactorTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAdalimumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedEtanerceptImmunoglobulin GInfliximabMethotrexateReceptors, Tumor Necrosis FactorTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID17943257
OpenAlexW1979251453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.