Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17943193›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2007

Recent and ongoing selection in the human genome.

Rasmus Nielsen, Ines Hellmann, Melissa Hubisz, Carlos Bustamante, Andrew G Clark

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 266 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
266citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

266 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evolutionary genetic dissection of human interferons.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2011
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Linking individual fitness to the evolution of cognition.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

206 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rasmus NielsenCenter for Comparative Genomics, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Kbh Ø, Denmark. rasmus@binf.ku.dk
Ines Hellmann
Melissa Hubisz
Carlos Bustamante
Andrew G Clark

Funding

Population Genetic Inferences From Dense Genotype DataR01HG003229 · NHGRI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI BUSTAMANTE, CARLOS DANIEL, CLARK, ANDREW G · 2004 to 2013
$4.8M
Dimension Reduction Approaches for Genome-wide Association TestingU01HL084706 · NHLBI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI CLARK, ANDREW G · 2006 to 2008
$921k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003229NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG003229NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL084706NHLBI NIH HHS U01HL084706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent availability of genome-scale genotyping data has led to the identification of regions of the human genome that seem to have been targeted by selection. These findings have increased our understanding of the evolutionary forces that affect the human genome, have augmented our knowledge of gene function and promise to increase our understanding of the genetic basis of disease. However, inferences of selection are challenged by several confounding factors, especially the complex demographic history of human populations, and concordance between studies is variable. Although such studies will always be associated with some uncertainty, steps can be taken to minimize the effects of confounding factors and improve our interpretation of their findings.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanSelection, GeneticEvolution, MolecularGenetics, PopulationHumans

Identifiers

PMID17943193
PMCPMC2933187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.