Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17941714›Full record

GuidelinePLoS medicine2007

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Erik von Elm, Douglas G Altman, Matthias Egger, Stuart J Pocock, Peter C Gøtzsche, Jan P Vandenbroucke, STROBE Initiative

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readGuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in PLoS medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3,248 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3,248citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02622529 completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Patients' Conscious Experience and Psychological Consequences of Awake Surgery for Intracerebral Lesions

TypeobservationalSponsorCantonal Hospital of St. GallenRan2015 to 2018Enrolled20ConditionsFear, Anxiety, StressArmsScreening through questionnaires
NCT05753358 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Total Worker Health for Wildland Firefighters

TypeinterventionalSponsorOregon Health and Science UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled150ConditionsHealth Behavior, Total Worker Health, Occupational HealthArmsTotal Worker Health for Wildland Firefighters
NCT06552676 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Risk Factors for Neck Phlegmon After Percutaneous Tracheostomy in ICU

TypeobservationalSponsorAzienda Usl di BolognaRan2018 to 2025Enrolled300ConditionsTracheostomy Complication, Quality of LifeArmsPercutaneous tracheostomy
NCT07783997 completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Association of Thrower's Ten Conditioning With Changes in Throwing Distance and Shoulder Strength in Amateur Male Discus Throwers: a Retrospective Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorSaveetha UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled32ConditionsHealth Adult SubjectsArmsThrower's Ten exercise program, Conventional conditioning program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3,248 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Reward Processing in Binge Eating and Harmful Drinking: A Systematic Review.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3,188 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erik von ElmInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. strobe@ispm.unibe.ch
Douglas G Altman
Matthias Egger
Stuart J Pocock
Peter C Gøtzsche
Jan P Vandenbroucke
STROBE Initiative

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. 18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.

Indexed as

Epidemiologic Research DesignObservationCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesPublishing

Identifiers

PMID17941714
PMCPMC2020495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.