Respiratory guidelines implementation in Canada.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Improving clinician self-efficacy does not increase asthma guideline use by primary care clinicians.Academic pediatrics
   Trial
2. Enablers of Physician Prescription of a Long-Term Asthma Controller in Patients with Persistent Asthma.Canadian respiratory journal · 2016
   Article
3. Pneumocafé project: an inquiry on current COPD diagnosis and management among General Practitioners in Italy through a novel tool for professional education.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2014
   Article
4. Translation of a pediatric asthma-management program into a community in Connecticut.Pediatrics · 2011
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as