Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17940600›Full record

ArticlePloS one2007

A simple method for combining genetic mapping data from multiple crosses and experimental designs.

Jeremy L Peirce, Karl W Broman, Lu Lu, Robert W Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Identification of quantitative trait loci influencing skeletal architecture in mice: emergence of Cdh11 as a primary candidate gene regulating femoral morphology.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2011
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Replication and narrowing of gene expression quantitative trait loci using inbred mice.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2009
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeremy L PeirceCenter for Neuroscience, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America. jpeirce@utmem.edu
Karl W Broman
Lu Lu
Robert W Williams

Funding

INFORMATICS CENTER FOR MOUSE NEUROGENETICSP20MH062009 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI WILLIAMS, ROBERT W. W · 2000 to 2004
$5.9M
Systems Genetics of Alcohol Response and Stress Effects in CNSU01AA013499 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI WILLIAMS, ROBERT W. · 2002 to 2016
$4.8M
NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA013499NIAAA NIH HHS U01AA01442501NIAAA NIH HHS U01AA13499NIAAA NIH HHS U24AA135BNIMH NIH HHS P20 MH062009NIMH NIH HHS P20-MH62009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the past decade many linkage studies have defined chromosomal intervals containing polymorphisms that modulate a variety of traits. Many phenotypes are now associated with enough mapping data that meta-analysis could help refine locations of known QTLs and detect many novel QTLs. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe describe a simple approach to combining QTL mapping results for multiple studies and demonstrate its utility using two hippocampus weight loci. Using data taken from two populations, a recombinant inbred strain set and an advanced intercross population we demonstrate considerable improvements in significance and resolution for both loci. 1-LOD support intervals were improved 51% for Hipp1a and 37% for Hipp9a. We first generate locus-wise permuted P-values for association with the phenotype from multiple maps, which can be done using a permutation method appropriate to each population. These results are then assigned to defined physical positions by interpolation between markers with known physical and genetic positions. We then use Fisher's combination test to combine position-by-position probabilities among experiments. Finally, we calculate genome-wide combined P-values by generating locus-specific P-values for each permuted map for each experiment. These permuted maps are then sampled with replacement and combined. The distribution of best locus-specific P-values for each combined map is the null distribution of genome-wide adjusted P-values. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our approach is applicable to a wide variety of segregating and non-segregating mapping populations, facilitates rapid refinement of physical QTL position, is complementary to other QTL fine mapping methods, and provides an appropriate genome-wide criterion of significance for combined mapping results.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingCrosses, GeneticPolymorphism, GeneticQuantitative Trait LociGenetic LinkageGenomeHippocampusHumansModels, BiologicalModels, GeneticPhenotypeSoftware

Identifiers

PMID17940600
PMCPMC2001185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.