Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17940502›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2007

Minichromosome maintenance proteins 2 and 5 in non-benign epithelial ovarian tumours: relationship with cell cycle regulators and prognostic implications.

H Gakiopoulou, P Korkolopoulou, G Levidou, I Thymara, A Saetta, C Piperi, N Givalos, I Vassilopoulos, K Ventouri, A Tsenga and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Expression of Minichromosome Maintenance Protein 2 (MCM2) in Oral Epithelial Dysplasia and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. MCMs in Cancer: Prognostic Potential and Mechanisms.Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

H GakiopoulouFirst Department of Pathology, Athens University, School of Medicine, GR-11527 Athens, Greece.
P Korkolopoulou
G Levidou
I Thymara
A Saetta
C Piperi
N Givalos
I Vassilopoulos
K Ventouri
A Tsenga
A Bamias
M-A Dimopoulos
E Agapitos
E Patsouris
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRAlexandra Hospital · GRAthens University of Economics and Business · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minichromosome maintenance proteins (MCM) have recently emerged as novel proliferation markers with prognostic implications in several tumour types. This is the first study investigating MCM-2 and MCM-5 immunohistochemical expression in a series of ovarian adenocarcinomas and low malignant potential (LMP) tumours aiming to determine possible associations with clinicopathological parameters, the conventional proliferation index Ki-67, cell cycle regulators (p53, p27(Kip1), p21(WAF1) and pRb) and patients' outcome. Immunohistochemistry was applied in a series of 43 cases of ovarian LMP tumours and 85 cases of adenocarcinomas. Survival analysis was restricted to adenocarcinomas. The median MCM-2 and MCM-5 labelling indices (LIs) were significantly higher in adenocarcinomas compared to LMP tumours (P<0.0001 for both associations). In adenocarcinomas, the levels of MCM-2 and MCM-5 increased significantly with advancing tumour stage (P=0.0052 and P=0.0180, respectively), whereas both MCM-2 and MCM-5 increased significantly with increasing tumour grade (P=0.0002 and P=0.0006, respectively) and the presence of bulky residual disease (P<0.0001 in both relationships). A strong positive correlation was established between MCM-2 or MCM-5 expression level and Ki-67 LI (P<0.0001) as well as p53 protein (P=0.0038 and P=0.0500, respectively). Moreover, MCM-2 LI was inversely correlated with p27(Kip-1) LI (P=0.0068). Finally, both MCM-2 and MCM-5 were associated significantly with adverse patients' outcome in both univariate (> or =20 vs >20%, P=0.0011 and > or =25 vs <25%, P=0.0100, respectively) and multivariate (P=0.0001 and 0.0090, respectively) analysis. An adequately powered independent group of 45 patients was used in order to validate our results in univariate survival analysis. In this group, MCM-2 and MCM-5 expression retained their prognostic significance (P<0.0001 in both relationships). In conclusion, MCM-2 and MCM-5 proteins appear to be promising as prognostic markers in patients with ovarian adenocarcinomas.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCell Cycle ProteinsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedMinichromosome Maintenance Complex Component 2Neoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasm StagingNuclear ProteinsOvarian NeoplasmsPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCell Cycle ProteinsMCM2 protein, humanMCM5 protein, humanMinichromosome Maintenance Complex Component 2Nuclear Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17940502
PMCPMC2360432
OpenAlexW2038390682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.