Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17938701›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2007

Treatment of depression in cancer patients.

G Rodin, M Katz, N Lloyd, E Green, J A Mackay, R K S Wong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Randomized controlled trial of collaborative care management of depression among low-income patients with cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2008
    Trial
  3. Assessing the Impact of Antidepressants on Cancer Treatment: A Retrospective Analysis of 14 Antineoplastic Agents.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Demoralization syndrome among cancer outpatients in Taiwan.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2012
    Article
  14. Nutritional and psychosocial status of colorectal cancer patients referred to an outpatient oncology clinic.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2012
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

G RodinDepartment of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario. gary.rodin@uhn.on.ca
M Katz
N Lloyd
E Green
J A Mackay
R K S Wong
Cancer Care Ontario · CAMcMaster University · CAPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAPrincess Margaret Hospital · NZSouthlake Regional Health Center · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

questionWhat is the efficacy of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatments for major depression and other depressive disorders in cancer populations? PERSPECTIVES: Depression occurs at an increased rate in medically ill populations, including patients with cancer. In the general population, depression has been shown to be responsive to structured forms of psychotherapy and to pharmacologic interventions. The Supportive Care Guidelines Group conducted a systematic review of the evidence for the effectiveness of those therapies in patients with depression and cancer and developed the present clinical practice guideline based on that review and on expert consensus. OUTCOMES: Outcomes of interest included symptomatic response to treatment, discontinuation rate of treatment, adverse effects, and quality of life. METHODOLOGY: Clinical recommendations were developed by the Supportive Care Guidelines Group based on a systematic review of the published literature through June 2005, feedback obtained from Ontario health care providers on the draft recommendations, the Report Approval Panel (rap) of Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care, and expert consensus.

resultsThe systematic review of the literature included eleven trials (seven of pharmacologic agents and four of non-pharmacologic interventions). Feedback received from 44 responding health care providers and the rap on the draft recommendations was addressed and documented in the guideline. Among providers, 82% agreed with the draft recommendations as stated, 68% agreed that the report should be approved as a practice guideline, and 73% indicated that they would be likely to use the guideline in their own practice. PRACTICE GUIDELINE: These recommendations apply to adult cancer patients with a diagnosis of major depression or other non-bipolar depressive disorders. They do not address the treatment of non-syndromal depressive symptoms, for which specific antidepressant treatment is not usually indicated. The guideline is intended both for oncology health professionals and for mental health professionals engaged in the treatment of cancer patients. Expert consensus was central to the development of the guideline recommendations because of limited evidence in cancer patients. RECOMMENDATIONS: Treatment of pain and other reversible physical symptoms should be instituted before or with initiation of specific antidepressant treatment. Antidepressant medications should be considered for the treatment of moderate-to-severe major depression in cancer patients. Current evidence does not support the relative superiority of one pharmacologic treatment over another, nor the superiority of pharmacologic treatment over psychosocial interventions. The choice of an antidepressant should be informed by individual medication and patient factors: the side effect profiles of the medication, tolerability of treatment (including the potential for interaction with other current medications), response to prior treatment, and patient preference. Cancer patients diagnosed with major depression may benefit from a combined modality approach that includes both psychosocial and pharmacologic interventions. Psychosocial treatment approaches that may be of value include those that provide information and support and those that address any combination of emotional, cognitive, and behavioural factors. QUALIFYING STATEMENTS: Referral to a mental health specialist is appropriate when the diagnosis of depression is unclear, when the syndrome is severe, when patients do not respond to treatment, or when other complicating factors that may affect the choice of treatment are present. Although care has been taken in the preparation of the information contained in this guideline, any person seeking to apply or to consult the guideline is expected to use independent medical judgment in the context of individual clinical circumstances or to seek out the supervision of a qualified clinician.

Indexed as

cancerdepressionPractice guidelinetreatment

Identifiers

PMID17938701
PMCPMC2002483
OpenAlexW2028590406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.