Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17938046›Full record

ReviewThe Psychiatric clinics of North America2007

Psychiatric issues in multiple sclerosis.

Lydia A Chwastiak, Dawn M Ehde

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Psychiatric clinics of North America, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Physical and Mental Health Comorbidities Among Adults With Multiple Sclerosis.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lydia A ChwastiakDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale New Haven Psychiatric Hospital, 184 Liberty Street, New Haven, CT 06519, USA. lydia.chwastiak@yale.edu
Dawn M Ehde
University of Washington Medical Center · USYale New Haven Hospital · US

Funding

Brief Motivational Interviewing to Improve Diabetes Self-Care in SchizophreniaK23MH077824 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CHWASTIAK, LYDIA ANN · 2008 to 2012
$899k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH077824
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MDD and anxiety disorders are highly prevalent among persons who have MS and have been associated with decreased adherence to MS treatment and poorer functional status and quality of life. Effective treatment is available for MDD, but this disorder continues to be underdetected and undertreated by MS providers. Treatment with pharmacotherapy is particularly challenging in this patient population, given the somatic symptom overlap between MS and depression and the increased burden of side effects. Larger randomized, controlled trials are needed to elucidate further the effectiveness of pharmacotherapy and to identify subgroups of patients who would benefit from this type of treatment for depression. There have been few rigorous studies of the prevalence and impact of anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, or serious mental illness such as bipolar disorder or schizophrenia, in MS samples.

Indexed as

ComorbidityDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansMental DisordersMultiple SclerosisQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID17938046
PMCPMC2706287
OpenAlexW2128234760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.