Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17937811›Full record

SynthesisBMC gastroenterology2007

Meta-analyses of FibroTest diagnostic value in chronic liver disease.

Thierry Poynard, Rachel Morra, Philippe Halfon, Laurent Castera, Vlad Ratziu, Françoise Imbert-Bismut, Sylvie Naveau, Dominique Thabut, Didier Lebrec, Fabien Zoulim and 5 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC gastroenterology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Noninvasive Evaluation of Prolonged-Release Pirfenidone in Compensated Liver Cirrhosis. ODISEA Study, a Randomised Trial.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Liver fibrosis quantification.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Thierry PoynardService d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Université Paris VI, CNRS ESA 8067 Paris, France. poynard@teaser.fr
Rachel Morra
Philippe Halfon
Laurent Castera
Vlad Ratziu
Françoise Imbert-Bismut
Sylvie Naveau
Dominique Thabut
Didier Lebrec
Fabien Zoulim
Marc Bourliere
Patrice Cacoub
Djamila Messous
Mona Munteanu
Victor de Ledinghen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFibroTest (FT) is a biomarker of liver fibrosis initially validated in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). The aim was to test two hypotheses, one, that the FT diagnostic value was similar in the three other frequent fibrotic diseases: chronic hepatitis B (CHB), alcoholic liver disease (ALD) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD); and the other, that the FT diagnostic value was similar for intermediate and extreme fibrosis stages.

methodsThe main end points were the FT area under the ROC curves (AUROCs) for the diagnosis of bridging fibrosis (F2F3F4 vs. F0F1), standardized for the spectrum of fibrosis stages, and the comparison of FT AUROCs between adjacent stages. Two meta-analyses were performed: one combining all the published studies (random model), and one of an integrated data base combining individual data. Sensitivity analysis integrated the independency of authors, lenght of biopsy, prospective design, respect of procedures, comorbidities, and duration between biopsy and serum sampling.

resultsA total of 30 studies were included which pooled 6,378 subjects with both FT and biopsy (3,501 HCV, 1,457 HBV, 267 NAFLD, 429 ALD, and 724 mixed). Individual data were analyzed in 3,282 patients. The mean standardized AUROC was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.83-0.86), without differences between causes of liver disease: HCV 0.85 (0.82-0.87), HBV 0.80 (0.77-0.84), NAFLD 0.84 (0.76-0.92), ALD 0.86 (0.80-0.92), mixed 0.85 (0.80-0.93). The AUROC for the diagnosis of the intermediate adjacent stages F2 vs. F1 (0.66; 0.63-0.68, n = 2,055) did not differ from that of the extreme stages F3 vs. F4 (0.69; 0.65-0.72, n = 817) or F1 vs. F0 (0.62; 0.59-0.65, n = 1788).

conclusionFibroTest is an effective alternative to biopsy in patients with chronic hepatitis C and B, ALD and NAFLD. The FT diagnostic value is similar for the diagnosis of intermediate and extreme fibrosis stages.

Indexed as

Liver Function TestsBiomarkersChronic DiseaseHumansLiver DiseasesPredictive Value of TestsROC CurveBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID17937811
PMCPMC2175505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.