Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17934840›Full record

Trial reportDigestive diseases and sciences2008

Treatment of Crohn's disease with leflunomide as second-line immunosuppression : a phase 1 open-label trial on efficacy, tolerability and safety.

Martin H Holtmann, Anna-Lena Gerts, Arndt Weinman, Peter R Galle, Markus F Neurath

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin H Holtmann1st Department of Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
Anna-Lena Gerts
Arndt Weinman
Peter R Galle
Markus F Neurath
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the potential of leflunomide, an immunosuppressant in rheumatoid arthritis, as a second-line immunosuppression treatment of patients with Crohn's disease refractory or intolerant to azathioprine. The study cohort consisted of 24 patients. The primary end point was steroid-free remission, and secondary end points were changes in the Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) and steroid intake, responsiveness of arthralgias and adverse events. Results were expressed in medians (quartiles). The remission rate increased from 21 to 42% by week 16 (P < 0.05). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the CDAI decreased from 219 to 87 (P = 0.018) and the steroid intake from 25 to 3 mg/day (P = 0.033). In the per-protocol analysis, the CDAI decreased from 182 to 87 (P = 0.0183) and the steroid intake from 45 to 4 mg/day (P = 0.0778). Patients with arthralgias improved significantly. However, adverse side effects were frequent. Leflunomide may improve disease activity, especially in terms of arthralgias, and reduce steroid intake. Adverse events were more frequent in our patients than has been reported in controlled studies for rheumatoid arthritis but corresponded to those found in post-marketing studies.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCrohn DiseaseDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrointestinal AgentsHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsIsoxazolesLeflunomideMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnti-Inflammatory AgentsGastrointestinal AgentsImmunosuppressive AgentsIsoxazolesLeflunomide

Identifiers

PMID17934840
OpenAlexW1492521997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.