Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17934835›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2008

The safety of two Bacillus probiotic strains for human use.

Iryna B Sorokulova, Iryna V Pinchuk, Muriel Denayrolles, Irina G Osipova, Jen M Huang, Simon M Cutting, Maria C Urdaci

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 194 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Safety Evaluation ofFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ameliorative Effects of Soybean Powder Fermented byInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. In-vitro and preclinical testing ofToxicology research · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Iryna B SorokulovaLaboratoire de Microbiologie, UMR5248, ENITA de Bordeaux, 1, cours du Général de Gaulle, CS 40201, 33175 Gradignan, France.
Iryna V Pinchuk
Muriel Denayrolles
Irina G Osipova
Jen M Huang
Simon M Cutting
Maria C Urdaci
Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse · FRRoyal Holloway University of London · GBAll-Russian State Scientific Research Institute for Control, Standardization and Certification of Veterinary Preparations · RUInstitut Polytechnique de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotics based on Bacillus strains have been increasingly proposed for prophylactic and therapeutic use against several gastro-intestinal diseases. We studied safety for two Bacillus strains included in a popular East European probiotic. Bacillus subtilis strain that was sensitive to all antibiotics listed by the European Food Safety Authority. Bacillus licheniformis strain was resistant to chloramphenicol and clindamycin. Both were non-hemolytic and did not produce Hbl or Nhe enterotoxins. No bceT and cytK toxin genes were found. Study of acute toxicity in BALB/c mice demonstrated no treatment-related deaths. The oral LD(50) for both strains was more than 2 x 10(11) CFU. Chronic toxicity studies were performed on mice, rabbits, and pigs and showed no signs of toxicity or histological changes in either organs or tissues. We demonstrated that while certain risks may exist for the B. licheniformis strain considering antibiotic resistance, B. subtilis strain may be considered as non-pathogenic and safe for human consumption.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornBacillusBiological FactorsDrug Resistance, BacterialEnterotoxinsMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CProbioticsRabbitsSwineToxicity TestsVirulenceBiological FactorsbiosporinEnterotoxins

Identifiers

PMID17934835
OpenAlexW2124269543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.