ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2008
Prospective evaluation of the pharmacodynamics of piritramide in neonates and infants.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Piritramide : A critical review].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Piritramide is a synthetic opioid commonly used in Germany and Austria for the analgesia of pediatric patients. Little pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data for the pediatric population is available. The aim of this investigation was to gain pharmacodynamic data on postsurgical analgesia and the side effects of piritramide. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty. Data were collected in an open, prospective clinical trial. After obtaining the parents' informed written consent, patients received a bolus of piritramide 50 mug/kg for postsurgical analgesia or to prevent pain resulting from invasive procedures. Titration doses of 15 microg/kg were allowed. Vital signs and pain intensity were closely monitored. Data from 39 patients could be included in the analysis. Of the patients, 95% were in the immediate postsurgical course, 5% had piritramide for invasive procedures, and 46% of the patients were ventilated. The mean piritramide dosage was 64 +/- 24 microg/kg. Pharmacodynamic analysis showed adequate analgesia for at least 50% of the spontaneously breathing patients for 120 min after piritramide bolus. More than 50% of the ventilated patients showed inadequate analgesia at any point in time after piritramide bolus. Fifty-nine percent (59%) of the ventilated patients received additive analgesia versus 31% of spontaneously breathing patients. No relevant changes of vital signs could be observed. One patient received naloxone for apnea. We conclude that dosages of more than 50-70 microg/kg are needed for sufficient analgesia in ventilated postsurgical infants. In spontaneously breathing patients, 50-70 microg/kg provides a 120-min period of analgesia for more than 50% of patients. Cardiovascular stability of the patients was good and, with one exception, there was no respiratory depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.