ReviewDer Nervenarzt2007
[Innovative care models for treating depression].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Effectiveness of case management-based aftercare coordination by phone for patients with depressive and anxiety disorders: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.BMC psychiatry · 2015Trial
- [Integrated care for depressive disorders].Der Nervenarzt · 2014Trial
- [Length of hospitalization for inpatient treatment of depression. Results of a multicentre study on the effects of a new treatment model].Der Nervenarzt · 2014Trial
- [Diagnosis and therapy of depression in the elderly--influence of patient and physician characteristics].Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische PsychologieTrial
- Health economic evaluation of an internet intervention for depression (deprexis), a randomized controlled trial.Health economics review · 2020Article
- Health economic evaluation of a web-based intervention for depression: the EVIDENT-trial, a randomized controlled study.Health economics review · 2019Article
- Choosing the appropriate treatment setting: which information and decision-making needs do adult inpatients with mental disorders have? A qualitative interview study.Patient preference and adherence · 2018Article
- Unipolar depression: diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations from the current S3/National Clinical Practice Guideline.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2010Article
- [Evidence-based therapy of depression: S3 guidelines on unipolar depression].Der Nervenarzt · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depressive disorders rank among the widespread diseases, and their relevance for the health care system is steadily increasing. Even though depressive disorders can generally be treated well, there is a further need to improve the care for depressive patients with regard to diagnostics, therapy, and cooperation of care sectors. Innovative and integrative models of care such as case management, disease management programs, and integrated care models are currently being discussed. They are expected to be useful in overcoming boundaries in the current care system and amending the course of disease and of patients' quality of life. Furthermore, changes in utilization of the health system are anticipated, leading to a diminishment of deficient care, undersupply and oversupply, and chronification. However, evidence is lacking to demonstrate the usefulness of these models of care in Germany now.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17934708What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.