Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17934317›Full record

ArticleHuman heredity2008

Multilocus lod scores in large pedigrees: combination of exact and approximate calculations.

Liping Tong, Elizabeth Thompson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human heredity, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genetic analysis of cognitive preservation in the midwestern Amish reveals a novel locus on chromosome 2.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Efficient identification of equivalences in dynamic graphs and pedigree structures.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Liping TongDepartment of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-4322, USA. tong@stat.washington.edu
Elizabeth Thompson

Funding

Methods for the Genetic Epidemiology of Complex TraitsR37GM046255 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI THOMPSON, ELIZABETH ALISON · 2008 to 2017
$4.2M
THE GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY OF COMPLEX TRAITSR01GM046255 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI THOMPSON, ELIZABETH ALISON · 1991 to 2007
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-46255NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM046255NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM046255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To detect the positions of disease loci, lod scores are calculated at multiple chromosomal positions given trait and marker data on members of pedigrees. Exact lod score calculations are often impossible when the size of the pedigree and the number of markers are both large. In this case, a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach provides an approximation. However, to provide accurate results, mixing performance is always a key issue in these MCMC methods. In this paper, we propose two methods to improve MCMC sampling and hence obtain more accurate lod score estimates in shorter computation time. The first improvement generalizes the block-Gibbs meiosis (M) sampler to multiple meiosis (MM) sampler in which multiple meioses are updated jointly, across all loci. The second one divides the computations on a large pedigree into several parts by conditioning on the haplotypes of some 'key' individuals. We perform exact calculations for the descendant parts where more data are often available, and combine this information with sampling of the hidden variables in the ancestral parts. Our approaches are expected to be most useful for data on a large pedigree with a lot of missing data.

Indexed as

Genetic LinkageLod ScorePedigreeComputational BiologyGenetic MarkersHaplotypesHumansMarkov ChainsMeiosisRecombination, GeneticGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID17934317
PMCPMC2701716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.