Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17933442›Full record

Trial reportVaccine2007

Efficacy of intranasal administration of a truncated NS1 modified live influenza virus vaccine in swine.

Amy L Vincent, Wenjun Ma, Kelly M Lager, Bruce H Janke, Richard J Webby, Adolfo García-Sastre, Jürgen A Richt

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Vaccine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Swine influenza A virus: challenges and novel vaccine strategies.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Amy L VincentVirus and Prion Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Ames, IA 50010, United States. amy.vincent@ars.usda.gov
Wenjun Ma
Kelly M Lager
Bruce H Janke
Richard J Webby
Adolfo García-Sastre
Jürgen A Richt
Agricultural Research Service · USIowa State University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USNational Animal Disease Center · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · US

Funding

Technological Development ComponentU19AI062623 · NIAID · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI MORAN, THOMAS M · 2004 to 2009
$21.3M
Live attenuated vaccines for epidemic and pandemic fluU01AI070469 · NIAID · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI GARCIA-SASTRE, ADOLFO · 2006 to 2010
$9.7M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI070469NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI062623NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI62623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the U.S., despite available swine influenza virus (SIV) vaccines, multiple influenza subtypes as well as antigenic and genetic variants within subtypes continue to circulate in the swine population. One of the challenges to control and eliminate SIV is that the currently used inactivated influenza virus vaccines do not provide adequate cross-protection against multiple antigenic variants of SIV in the field. We previously generated a recombinant H3N2 swine influenza virus (SIV) based on the influenza A/SW/TX/4199-2/98 virus (TX98) containing an NS1 gene expressing a truncated NS1 protein of 126 amino acids, TX98-NS1Delta126 virus. This recombinant strain was demonstrated to be highly attenuated in swine and showed potential for use as a modified live-virus vaccine (MLV) after intratracheal application in pigs. However, this route of inoculation is not practical for vaccination in the field. In the present study, we first compared intramuscular and intranasal routes of application of the MLV, and found that the intranasal route was superior in priming the local (mucosal) immune response. Pigs were then vaccinated via the intranasal route and challenged with wild type homologous TX98 H3N2 virus, with a genetic and antigenic variant H3N2 SIV (influenza A/SW/CO/23619/99 virus, CO99) and a heterosubtypic H1N1 SIV (influenza A/SW/IA/00239/2004 virus, IA04). The intranasally vaccinated pigs were completely protected against homologous challenge. In addition, MLV vaccination provided nearly complete protection against the antigenic H3N2 variant CO99 virus. When challenged with the H1N1 IA04 virus, MLV vaccinated animals displayed reduced fever and virus titers despite minimal reduction in lung lesions. In vaccinated pigs, there was no serologic cross-reactivity by HI assays with the heterologous or heterosubtypic viruses. However, there appeared to be substantial cross-reactivity in antibodies at the mucosal level with the CO99 virus in MLV vaccinated pigs.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAnimalsAntibodies, ViralBody TemperatureCross ReactionsGenome, ViralInfluenza A Virus, H3N2 SubtypeInfluenza VaccinesInjections, IntramuscularOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsPneumoniaSwine DiseasesVaccines, AttenuatedViral Nonstructural ProteinsAntibodies, ViralInfluenza VaccinesINS1 protein, influenza virusVaccines, AttenuatedViral Nonstructural Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17933442
PMCPMC2099695
OpenAlexW2008611427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.