Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17932666›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2008

Comparative in vitro study of five mechanical embolectomy systems: effectiveness of clot removal and risk of distal embolization.

Thomas Liebig, Jörg Reinartz, Ralf Hannes, Elina Miloslavski, Hans Henkes

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. In vitro models for the experimental evaluation of mechanical thrombectomy devices in acute ischemic stroke.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Two cases of successful recanalization for acute cerebral artery embolism during perioperative period of radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Advances in stroke therapy.Drug delivery and translational research · 2011
    Article
  10. Mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: catch device.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2011
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Endovascular stroke treatment today.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2011
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Containing a Clot in the Mid-Basilar Artery Using a Self-Expandable Stent to Prevent Distal Clot Migration during Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis. A Case Report.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2009
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Acute stroke therapy 1981-2009.Klinische Neuroradiologie · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas LiebigAbteilung für Neuroradiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. thomas.liebig@roe.med.tum.de
Jörg Reinartz
Ralf Hannes
Elina Miloslavski
Hans Henkes
Katharinenhospital · DEPhenox (Germany) · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe report an in vitro study comparing the effectiveness of clot removal and clot fragmentation of five embolectomy systems.

methodsA flow model was embolized with fresh and old thrombi, occluding an inner diameter of 2-5 mm simulating internal carotid artery (ICA), basilar artery (BA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) branch occlusion. Embolectomy was performed using five retrieval systems: CATCH (Balt), Merci retriever (Concentric), InTime and Attracter (Boston Scientific), and the Phenox Clot Retriever (Phenox). Clot removal and evidence and type of thrombus fragmentation and distal embolization were recorded.

resultsThere were no observable differences attributable to thrombus age. The Merci, CATCH and Phenox Clot Retriever were equally able to mobilize and remove thrombi with the exception of one particularly firm clot. There were marked differences in terms of thrombus fragmentation and distal embolization. All devices produced micro- and macrofragments during penetration and retrieval. The Phenox Clot Retriever was able to filter fragments. The InTime and Attracter devices failed to retrieve thrombi in this model and achieved partial removal at best with a tendency towards thrombus displacement and fragmentation.

conclusionWithin limits, the experimental setup was appropriate for generating occlusions of diameter 2-5 mm of various lengths, simulating ICA, BA and MCA thromboembolism. In this model, thrombus mobilization appeared to be less dependent upon the individual design of the retrieval system than on thrombus fragmentation. The ability to prevent distal embolization is, however, strongly dependent on the ability of a thrombectomy device to capture fragments that are generated during removal of the device.

Indexed as

Basilar ArteryCarotid Artery, InternalCarotid Artery ThrombosisEmbolectomyEquipment DesignEquipment FailureHumansIntracranial EmbolismIn Vitro TechniquesMiddle Cerebral ArteryModels, CardiovascularPulsatile FlowTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID17932666
OpenAlexW2025679046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.