Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17932588›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of cardiology2007

Treatment delays in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction at the Quebec Heart and Lung Institute.

Patrick Garceau, Jean-Pierre Déry, Philippe Lachance, Stéfanie Grenier, Josep Rodés-Cabau, Gérald Barbeau, Olivier F Bertrand, Onil Gleeton, Eric Larose, Can Man Nguyen and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Association of Admission Time and Mortality in STEMI Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Patrick GarceauQuebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval Hospital, Sainte Foy, Quebec City, Quebec.
Jean-Pierre Déry
Philippe Lachance
Stéfanie Grenier
Josep Rodés-Cabau
Gérald Barbeau
Olivier F Bertrand
Onil Gleeton
Eric Larose
Can Man Nguyen
Bernard Noël
Guy Proulx
Louis Roy
Robert de Larochellière

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent guidelines for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) recommend performing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 90 min of hospital arrival. However, recent data suggest that in a real-world setting, median door-to-balloon (DTB) time is closer to 180 min for transfer patients, with less than 5% of patients being treated within 90 min. A retrospective observational study was conducted to assess time to treatment in patients undergoing primary PCI at the Quebec Heart and Lung Institute (QHLI).

methodsConsecutive lytic-eligible patients undergoing primary PCI at the QHLI for STEMI between April 2004 and March 2005 were included in the present analysis. The primary evaluation was DTB time measured from arrival at the first hospital to first balloon inflation. Clinical outcomes were in-hospital death, reinfarction and bleeding. DTB times and hospital outcomes of patients transferred from referring hospitals were compared with those of patients presenting directly to the QHLI.

resultsDuring the study period, 203 lytic-eligible patients were treated with primary PCI. Sixty-nine patients presented directly to the QHLI and 134 were transferred from other hospitals. Six transfer patients were excluded because of missing time variables. The median DTB time was 114 min in transfer patients, compared with 87 min in patients presenting directly to the QHLI (P<0.001). DTB time was less than 90 min in 24% of the transfer population compared with 55% of patients presenting directly to the QHLI (P<0.001). In patients referred from hospitals within a radius of 30 km from the QHLI (n=100), median DTB time was 106 min with 30% receiving PCI within 90 min. In these patients, estimated PCI-related delay was 74 min. For patients presenting to hospitals beyond 30 km (n=28), median DTB time was 142 min with 4% receiving reperfusion within 90 min. In these patients, estimated PCI-related delay was 110 min. Median DTB time for patients presenting during off hours at the QHLI was 92 min compared with 79 min for patients presenting during regular business hours (P=0.02). In patients transferred from other hospitals, median DTB time was 118 min during off hours and 108 min during normal business hours (P=0.07).

conclusionsA DTB time of less than 90 min can be achieved in the majority of patients presenting directly to a primary PCI centre. However, for patients presenting to community hospitals, transfer for primary PCI is often associated with delayed revascularization. The present study highlights the need for careful patient selection when deciding between on-site thrombolytic therapy and transfer for primary PCI for STEMI patients presenting to hospitals without PCI facilities.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services Needs and DemandAgedCardiologyFemaleHospitals, CommunityHumansMaleMedicineMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPatient TransferQuebecRetrospective StudiesSpecialization

Identifiers

PMID17932588
PMCPMC2794463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.