ReviewJournal of occupational rehabilitation2007
Measuring return to work.
Review in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Factors associated with return to work among people on work absence due to long-term neck or back pain: a narrative systematic review.BMJ open · 2017Pooled it
- A classification of components of workplace disability management programs: results from a systematic review.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2014Pooled it
- Predictors of stable return-to-work in non-acute, non-specific spinal pain: low total prior sick-listing, high self prediction and young age. A two-year prospective cohort study.BMC family practice · 2010Trial
- Subacute and chronic, non-specific back and neck pain: cognitive-behavioural rehabilitation versus primary care. A randomized controlled trial.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2008Trial
- Development of a screening tool predicting the transition from acute to chronic low back pain for patients in a GP setting: protocol of a multinational prospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2008Trial
- Psychological Service Utilization and its Impact on Return to Work in Vocational Retraining Centers: A Cohort Study.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Development of a Job Retention Vocational Rehabilitation Intervention for People with Multiple Sclerosis Following the Person-Based Approach.Clinical rehabilitation · 2024Article
- A Review on the Usability, Flexibility, Affinity, and Affordability of Virtual Technology for Rehabilitation Training of Upper Limb Amputees.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The effectiveness of occupational therapy supporting return to work for people who sustain serious injuries or develop long-term (physical or mental) health conditions: A systematic review.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2023Review
- Managing disabled workers due to occupational accidents in Indonesia: a case study on return to work program.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Article
- Patients views on which return-to-work outcomes should be prioritised: A nominal group technique focus group.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2022Article
- Factors affecting return to work after surgical treatment of trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis.The Journal of hand surgery, European volume · 2021Article
- eHealth interventions to facilitate work participation: a scoping review.JBI evidence synthesis · 2021Article
- A Systematic Search and Review of Questionnaires Measuring Individual psychosocial Factors Predicting Return to Work After Musculoskeletal and Common Mental Disorders.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2021Review
- Return to employment for working-aged adults after burn injury: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Predictors of return to work among women with long-term neck/shoulder and/or back pain: A 1-year prospective study.PloS one · 2021Article
- Does motivation predict return to work? A longitudinal analysis.Journal of occupational health · 2021Article
- Effectiveness of Open-Ended Psychotherapy Under Clinically Representative Conditions.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
- Integrating Israeli Defense Force (IDF) veterans with disabilities into the workforce: characteristics and predictors.Israel journal of health policy research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is argued that one of the factors limiting the understanding of return to work (RTW) following work disability is the use of measurement tools that do not capture a complete picture of workers' RTW experiences. To facilitate the investigation of RTW, the current authors proposed a developmental conceptualization of RTW, which argues for an expanded awareness that encompasses four phases: off work, work reintegration, work maintenance and advancement. This paper reports on work undertaken with the aim of operationalizing the conceptualization.
methodsA review of the RTW and related literature, with databases searched including PubMed, EconLit, and PsycInfo. We began by extracting details of RTW instruments used by previous researchers. We then interpreted these within the context of the phases of RTW. Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) to inform our thinking and coding structure, we conceptualized phase-based RTW outcomes and categorized them as 'tasks and actions', 'contextual' or 'process driven'. Iteratively, we reviewed existing instruments for their use as measures of RTW. Where gaps in instrumentation were found, the wider vocational and career assessment literature was searched for instruments that could be adapted for use in RTW research.
resultsResults indicate that, although numerous research instruments have been used to assess RTW, within the scientific literature some important dimensions of RTW lack instrumentation. In particular, we found that outcomes such as goal setting, motivation, expectation, job seeking, work maintenance, and career advancement require operationalization. Amongst the outcomes had been operationalized, we found considerable variation in conceptual development and application.
conclusionsThe lack of consistency and comprehensiveness of RTW measurement is one of the factors compromising the advancement of the field of RTW research. It is suggested that a more complete and psychometrically sound array of research instruments, grounded within a commonly adopted paradigm, would further the understanding of RTW and the factors affecting it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17929149What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.