Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17927811›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2007

Transcriptional regulatory network for sexual differentiation in fission yeast.

Juan Mata, Anna Wilbrey, Jürg Bähler

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Meiotic cohesin Rec8 imposes fitness costs on fission yeast gametes favoring the evolution of parental bias in gene expression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Structural duality enables a single protein to act as a toxin-antidote pair for meiotic drive.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Membrane and organelle rearrangement during ascospore formation in budding yeast.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. TheeLife · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Open biology · 2018
    Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juan MataCancer Research UK Fission Yeast Functional Genomics Group, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge CB10 1HH, UK. jm593@cam.ac.uk
Anna Wilbrey
Jürg Bähler
Wellcome Sanger Institute · GBBabraham Institute · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK A6517Wellcome Trust 077118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChanges in gene expression are hallmarks of cellular differentiation. Sexual differentiation in fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe) provides a model system for gene expression programs accompanying and driving cellular specialization. The expression of hundreds of genes is modulated in successive waves during meiosis and sporulation in S. pombe, and several known transcription factors are critical for these processes.

resultsWe used DNA microarrays to investigate meiotic gene regulation by examining transcriptomes after genetic perturbations (gene deletion and/or overexpression) of rep1, mei4, atf21 and atf31, which encode known transcription factors controlling sexual differentiation. This analysis reveals target genes at a genome-wide scale and uncovers combinatorial control by Atf21p and Atf31p. We also studied two transcription factors not previously implicated in sexual differentiation whose meiotic induction depended on Mei4p: Rsv2p induces stress-related genes during spore formation, while Rsv1p represses glucose-metabolism genes. Our data further reveal negative feedback interactions: both Rep1p and Mei4p not only activate specific gene expression waves (early and middle genes, respectively) but are also required for repression of genes induced in the previous waves (Ste11p-dependent and early genes, respectively).

conclusionThese data give insight into regulatory principles controlling the extensive gene expression program driving sexual differentiation and highlight sophisticated interactions and combinatorial control among transcription factors. Besides triggering simultaneous expression of gene waves, transcription factors also repress genes in the previous wave and induce other factors that in turn regulate a subsequent wave. These dependencies ensure an ordered and timely succession of transcriptional waves during cellular differentiation.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, FungalActivating Transcription FactorsMeiosisOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisSchizosaccharomycesSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsSex DifferentiationTrans-ActivatorsTranscription FactorsActivating Transcription Factorsatf21 protein, S pombemei4 protein, S pomberep1 protein, S pombeSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID17927811
PMCPMC2246291
OpenAlexW2142714550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.