Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17925250›Full record

ReviewProgress in brain research2007

Modeling the mammalian locomotor CPG: insights from mistakes and perturbations.

David A McCrea, Ilya A Rybak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in brain research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Motor modules in robot-aided walking.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2012
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Tonically active interneurons gate motor output inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Spinal control of locomotion before and after spinal cord injury.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Left-Right Locomotor Coordination in Human Neonates.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Spinal Interneurons as Gatekeepers to Neuroplasticity after Injury or Disease.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David A McCreaSpinal Cord Research Centre and Department of Physiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3E 3J7, Canada. dave@scrc.umanitoba.ca
Ilya A Rybak
Drexel University · USUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

Spinal Control of Locomotion: Studies and ApplicationsR01NS048844 · NINDS · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI RYBAK, ILYA A · 2006 to 2010
$2.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS048844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A computational model of the mammalian spinal cord circuitry incorporating a two-level central pattern generator (CPG) with separate half-center rhythm generator (RG) and pattern formation (PF) networks is reviewed. The model consists of interacting populations of interneurons and motoneurons described in the Hodgkin-Huxley style. Locomotor rhythm generation is based on a combination of intrinsic (persistent sodium current dependent) properties of excitatory RG neurons and reciprocal inhibition between the two half-centers comprising the RG. The two-level architecture of the CPG was suggested from an analysis of deletions (spontaneous omissions of activity) and the effects of afferent stimulation on the locomotor pattern and rhythm observed during fictive locomotion in the cat. The RG controls the activity of the PF network that in turn defines the rhythmic pattern of motoneuron activity. The model produces realistic firing patterns of two antagonist motoneuron populations and generates locomotor oscillations encompassing the range of cycle periods and phase durations observed during cat locomotion. A number of features of the real CPG operation can be reproduced with separate RG and PF networks, which would be difficult if not impossible to demonstrate with a classical single-level CPG. The two-level architecture allows the CPG to maintain the phase of locomotor oscillations and cycle timing during deletions and during sensory stimulation. The model provides a basis for functional identification of spinal interneurons involved in generation and control of the locomotor pattern.

Indexed as

LocomotionModels, NeurologicalProprioceptionAnimalsFeedbackLearningMammalsMotor NeuronsPeriodicityPsychomotor Performance

Identifiers

PMID17925250
PMCPMC2408748
OpenAlexW1532921825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.