Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17924164›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2007

Comparison of mecA polymerase chain reaction with phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

M M Baddour, M M AbuElKheir, A J Fatani

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ARGs Detection inMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biofilm-Forming ClinicalFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Impairments of mecA gene detection in bovine Staphylococcus spp.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M M BaddourMicrobiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. mbaddour@ksu.edu.sa
M M AbuElKheir
A J Fatani
King Saud University · SAAlexandria University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study, several conventional methods to detect methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were compared with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of mecA gene-positive isolates. Cefoxitin E-test was also evaluated as a possible phenotypic method of MRSA detection. Oxacillin agar screen and PBP2' latex agglutination methods were found to be more sensitive than oxacillin and cefoxitin disk-diffusion methods. Cefoxitin disk diffusion was found to be the most specific. A combination of oxacillin agar screening with cefoxitin disk diffusion, or oxacillin disk diffusion with PBP2', improved sensitivity and specificity. Cefoxitin E-test with the current break points had low sensitivity and specificity (33.3% and 75%, respectively) for the detection of MRSA. However, changing the break points to <or= 4 microg/ml and to >or= 6 microg/ml for sensitive and resistant, respectively, greatly improved both. Changing the 30-microg cefoxitin disk-diffusion break points to <or= 21 mm for resistant slightly improved sensitivity but had no effect on specificity. It was therefore concluded that the use of more than one screening method is necessary to detect all MRSA isolates in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Methicillin ResistanceAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsCefoxitinDNA, BacterialHumansLatex Fixation TestsMethicillinMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPenicillin-Binding ProteinsPhenotypePolymerase Chain ReactionStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsCefoxitinDNA, BacterialmecA protein, Staphylococcus aureusMethicillinPenicillin-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17924164
OpenAlexW2146474772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.