ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2007
Neuronal apoptosis inhibitory protein is overexpressed in patients with unfavorable prognostic factors in breast cancer.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Restoring apoptosis in breast cancer via peptide mediated disruption of survivin IAP interaction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Integrative PANoptosis gene profiling reveals prognostic and therapeutic insights in prostate cancer.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Mechanism of inflammasomes in cancer and targeted therapies.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Article
- NOD-like receptors: major players (and targets) in the interface between innate immunity and cancer.Bioscience reports · 2019Review
- Inducing death in tumor cells: roles of the inhibitor of apoptosis proteins.F1000Research · 2017Review
- Tumor suppressor p53 induces miR-15a processing to inhibit neuronal apoptosis inhibitory protein (NAIP) in the apoptotic response DNA damage in breast cancer cell.American journal of translational research · 2017Article
- Inflammasomes in Myeloid Cells: Warriors Within.Microbiology spectrum · 2017Review
- NLR-regulated pathways in cancer: opportunities and obstacles for therapeutic interventions.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2016Review
- Double gene siRNA knockdown of mutant p53 and TNF induces apoptosis in triple-negative breast cancer cells.OncoTargets and therapy · 2016Article
- Botulinum neurotoxin type A inhibits synaptic vesicle 2 expression in breast cancer cell lines.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2015Article
- Gene dosage as a relevant mechanism contributing to the determination of ovarian function in Turner syndrome.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2014Article
- Apoptosis inhibition or inflammation: the role of NAIP protein expression in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas compared to non-neoplastic lymph node.Journal of inflammation (London, England) · 2012Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuronal apoptosis inhibitory protein (NAIP) is a recently identified inhibitor of apoptosis protein. However, the clinical relevance of NAIP expression is not completely understood. In an attempt to determine the clinical relevance of NAIP expression in breast cancer, the levels of NAIP and survivin expression were measured in 117 breast cancer samples and 10 normal breast tissues using quantitative reversetranscriptase-polymerase chain reaction. While there was no evidence of NAIP expression in the normal breast tissue, NAIP was expressed in all breast cancer samples. The level of NAIP expression in breast cancer was significantly higher (257 times) than in the universal tumor control. There was a strong correlation between the level of NAIP expression and the level of survivin expression (p=0.001). The level of NAIP expression in patients with a large tumor (>/=T2) and patients with an unfavorable histology (nuclear grade III) was significantly higher than in those patients with a small tumor (T1) and patients with a favorable histology (nuclear grade I, II) (p=0.026 and p=0.050, respectively). Although the level of NAIP expression was higher in patients with other unfavorable prognostic factors, it was not significant. The three-year relapse-free survival rate was not significantly the patients showing high NAIP expression and patients showing low NAIP expression (86.47plusmn;4.79% vs. 78.74plusmn;6.57%). Further studies should include the expressions of NAIP in a larger number of patients and for a longer period of follow-up to evaluate correlation with metastasis and treatment outcome. In conclusion, NAIP is overexpressed in breast cancer patients with unfavorable clinical features such as stage and tumor size, suggesting that NAIP would play a role in the disease manifestation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.