Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17922086›Full record

ReviewWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2007

[The role of hip protectors in the prevention of hip fractures in older people].

Lukas A Holzer, Gerold Holzer

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lukas A HolzerUniversitätsklinik für Orthopädie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Osterreich.
Gerold Holzer
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hip fractures are a serious health problem all over the world with grave consequences for the people and health systems involved. Osteoporosis and sideways falls and the force this involves in the hip area are the main cause for hip fractures. Hip protectors have been developed to prevent hip fractures, which are caused by falls. Biomechanical studies have shown their effectiveness, but compliance is low. Nevertheless, compliance can be raised by providing information on the dangers of hip fractures and the significance that hip protectors have to prevent this, as well as improving the design and mechanical properties of individual hip protectors. That is why clinical studies have produced controversial results. Future studies on hip protectors with a patient friendly design will clarify the situation. We present a review on the current situation and some future aspects.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsProtective DevicesAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleForecastingHip FracturesHumansMaleOsteoporosisPatient ComplianceProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID17922086
OpenAlexW100836970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.