Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17921355›Full record

ArticleGenome research2007

Comparative analysis of chicken chromosome 28 provides new clues to the evolutionary fragility of gene-rich vertebrate regions.

Laurie Gordon, Shan Yang, Mary Tran-Gyamfi, Dan Baggott, Mari Christensen, Aaron Hamilton, Richard Crooijmans, Martien Groenen, Susan Lucas, Ivan Ovcharenko and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Avian genomics lends insights into endocrine function in birds.General and comparative endocrinology · 2018
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Organization and function of the 3D genome.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2016
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. A high resolution map of mammalian X chromosome fragile regions assessed by large-scale comparative genomics.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Testing chromosomal phylogenies and inversion breakpoint reuse in Drosophila. The martensis cluster revisited.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2011
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Laurie GordonGenome Biology Group, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA.
Shan Yang
Mary Tran-Gyamfi
Dan Baggott
Mari Christensen
Aaron Hamilton
Richard Crooijmans
Martien Groenen
Susan Lucas
Ivan Ovcharenko
Lisa Stubbs
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory · USWageningen University & Research · NLJoint Genome Institute · US

Funding

Regulatory landscape of the human genome: comparative and evolutionary analysis.ZIALM200881 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI OVCHARENKO, IVAN · 2009 to 2025
$20.1M
Regulatory landscape of the human genome: comparative and evolutionary analysis.Z01LM200881 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI OVCHARENKO, IVAN · 2008 to 2008
$690k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chicken genome draft sequence has provided a valuable resource for studies of an important agricultural and experimental model species and an important data set for comparative analysis. However, some of the most gene-rich segments are missing from chicken genome draft assemblies, limiting the analysis of a substantial number of genes and preventing a closer look at regions that are especially prone to syntenic rearrangements. To facilitate the functional and evolutionary analysis of one especially gene-rich, rearrangement-prone genomic region, we analyzed sequence from BAC clones spanning chicken microchromosome GGA28; as a complement we also analyzed a gene-sparse, stable region from GGA11. In these two regions we documented the conservation and lineage-specific gain and loss of protein-coding genes and precisely mapped the locations of 31 major human-chicken syntenic breakpoints. Altogether, we identified 72 lineage-specific genes, many of which are found at or near syntenic breaks, implicating evolutionary breakpoint regions as major sites of genetic innovation and change. Twenty-two of the 31 breakpoint regions have been reused repeatedly as rearrangement breakpoints in vertebrate evolution. Compared with stable GC-matched regions, GGA28 is highly enriched in CpG islands, as are break-prone intervals identified elsewhere in the chicken genome; evolutionary breakpoints are further enriched in GC content and CpG islands, highlighting a potential role for these features in genome instability. These data support the hypothesis that chromosome rearrangements have not occurred randomly over the course of vertebrate evolution but are focused preferentially within "fragile" regions with unusual DNA sequence characteristics.

Indexed as

ChromosomesEvolution, MolecularAnimalsChickensChromosome BreakageChromosome MappingGene DuplicationGene RearrangementGenome, HumanHumansMiceModels, GeneticSpecies SpecificitySynteny

Identifiers

PMID17921355
PMCPMC2045143
OpenAlexW2071040962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.