Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17920552›Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2007

Immunology of neurological gene therapy: how T cells modulate viral vector-mediated therapeutic transgene expression through immunological synapses.

Pedro R Lowenstein, Kurt Kroeger, Maria G Castro

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Single vs. combination immunotherapeutic strategies for glioma.Expert opinion on biological therapy · 2017
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pedro R LowensteinBoard of Governors' Gene Therapeutics Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, California 90048, USA. lowensteinp@cshs.org
Kurt Kroeger
Maria G Castro
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Trophic gene transfer in MPTP animalsU54NS045309 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI FEDEROFF, HOWARD J. · 2002 to 2006
$9.7M
Gene therapy for chronic neurodegenerative disordersR01NS044556 · NINDS · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI CASTRO, MARIA G · 2002 to 2006
$2.0M
Gene Therapy for Neurological DiseasesR01NS042893 · NINDS · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI LOWENSTEIN, PEDRO R · 2002 to 2006
$1.8M
Gene Therapy for GliomaR21NS047298 · NINDS · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI LOWENSTEIN, PEDRO R · 2003 to 2004
$354k
APOPTOSIS OF ANTERIOR PITUITARY CELLSR03TW006273 · FIC · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI CASTRO, MARIA G · 2004 to 2006
$102k
FIC NIH HHS 1 R03 TW006273-01FIC NIH HHS R03 TW006273NINDS NIH HHS 1 R01 NS 42893.01NINDS NIH HHS 1 R01 NS44556.01NINDS NIH HHS 1R21 NS047298-01NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS042893NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS044556NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS047298NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS045309NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS045309-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene therapy has been shown to be a powerful new approach to the treatment of brain diseases. Brain neurodegenerations, brain tumors, inherited brain diseases, and autoimmune disorders are currently recognized as proper targets for gene therapeutics. Advances in the development of viral vectors (especially improvements in their immune profiles), the capacity to regulate transgene expression, and identification of appropriate therapeutic constructs have made the transition into clinical trials for gene therapy possible. One particular remaining challenge is the immune response that could be raised against either the viral vectors themselves or any regulatory or therapeutic transgenes. Because of the structure of brain immune responses, viral gene transfer into the brain can, under certain circumstances, be invisible to the systemic immune response and thus not generate a deleterious immune attack. If, however, the systemic immune system is primed against any vector antigen, the systemic immune response eliminates transgene expression and thus curtails the therapeutic efficacy of gene therapy. Mechanistic studies of brain immune responses indicate that the adaptive arm of the immune system may indeed be able to kill transduced cells. To move neurological gene therapy into the clinic in an effective and safe manner, these are the developments needed: novel viral vectors that either display a reduced capacity to stimulate an adaptive immune response or become invisible to the immune system after the delivery of the vector genome to the nucleus of transduced cells, and ways either to steer the immune response away from cytotoxic responses or to induce tolerance to gene therapy products.

Indexed as

TransgenesAnimalsBrain DiseasesGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsHumansT-LymphocytesViruses

Identifiers

PMID17920552
PMCPMC2268648
OpenAlexW2038323245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.